a Hi-Tech Medical College, Department of Orthopaedics, Odisha, India
b Care Hospitals, Department of Orthopaedics, Odisha, India
c Hi-Tech Medical College, Department of Anatomy, Odisha, India
d Jaypee Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Noida, Índia e Care Hospitals, Department of Physiotherapy, Odisha, India
Introduction
Osteoarthritis especially of the hip and knee not only affects the quality of life of the individual not only physically but also emotionally and socially, limiting activities such as walking, climbing stairs, and self-care.1
Total knee arthroplasty has become a common procedure2,3 in treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis. TKA is the most effective surgical procedure for reducing pain and increasing functional capacity, correct the deformity and improve the patient’s quality of life (QoL)4–8 when conservative treatment fails9 with greatest improvements in pain and function occur during the first 3–6 months after surgery.10,11 Majority of patients receiving TKA report improved pain and function,12–14 whereas 15–30% report no improvement15,16 or worsened pain and functional status after surgery. The unfavorable outcomes may result from preoperative medical comorbidities, gender, mental health status,15,16 social support,17,18 obesity,19 sedentary lifestyle, lack of walking, bed ridden patients or increased waiting time for knee replacement.20
These patients may not tolerate the operative stress and less often involve themselves or cooperate in the postoperative physical therapy and hence remain deprived of beautiful outcomes of TKA. They often experience persistent pain, swelling, stiffness and difficulty in walking or perform routine activities and remain dissatisfied in comparison to some patients who perform really well following TKA and experience minimal pain or discomfort.
Various studies have correlated the results from total knee replacements with various pre surgical and comorbid factors.10–17 However, little has been described regarding the effects of pre surgical walking status and patient’s education regarding the procedure on functional outcomes and QoL after surgery of patients underwent surgical treatment.
Thus, we prospectively analyzed the effect of preoperative walking status and patient’s surgical education on functional outcomes and the three dimensions of QoL (pain, physical function and mental health) after elective total knee arthroplasty. Materials and methods
A prospective cohort study was completed of patients undergoing unilateral primary TKAs for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Patients were recruited and followed up between January 2014 and October 2015 at 3 centers in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. We prospectively reviewed 168 knees in 154 patients with knee osteoarthritis admitted for TKA to analyze the effect of preoperative walking status and patient’s surgical education on functional outcomes and QoL after elective total knee arthroplasty. 14 patients had a contralateral TKA within 12 months of the first procedure during the course of the study. The study was approved by institutional ethics committee and all patients provided agreement and consent for inclusion in the study. We excluded patients with the following: functional illiteracy, inflammatory or other severe musculoskeletal conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, sciatica), metabolic or neoplastic disease, and severe psychopathology, knee infection or comorbidity (defined as a diagnosis, such as heart failure or respiratory disease severe enough to impede total participation in procedures).
Patient selection, informed consent and patient details were obtained using a standard protocol by two surgeons (SKD, NP). All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon team. The surgical technique was the same in all cases: an anteromedial approach without patellar resurfacing using a femoral and tibial intramedullary cutting guide. The femoral and tibial components were cemented. The prostheses used was standard or posterior stabilized P.F.C.® sigmaTM knee systems (DePuy Orthopedics, Warsaw, IN, USA) in all patients. QoL outcome measures
Functional ability: were assessed with Western Ontario and McMaster’s Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and Friedmann and Wyman Classification of Functional Outcome, the Knee Society Score (KSS), Walking Status Grading and 10- meter walk test (10MWT) and Short Form-36 Questionnaire (SF-36) for physical health.
Locomotor function
Were assessed using Walking Status Grading, 10-meter walk test (10MWT) and the 30 second timed chair stand tests. General health, lower limb strength, range of movement and compliance with exercise were also measured.
Pain and social disability
Was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES D10) for mental health.
Waiting-time to surgery in weeks and length of hospital stay in days, were also included. All the tests were performed and data were obtained at baseline before surgery, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months through face-to-face interaction and, where appropriate, examination of hospital medical records. Data on perioperative and postoperative complications, posthospital care and destination at discharge, compliance with exercise were also measured, as well as rehabilitation were gathered at the follow-up interviews.
Methodology
The preliminary data of all these patients were entered in the data charts at 3 centers and later were entered into the registry at the parent institution. The patients were subjected to history, clinical examination, standing Skiagram of Bilateral lower limbs with knee in Anteroposterior and Lateral Views and routine blood investigations like blood sugar, serum uric acid, serology, differential and complete blood counts were performed. Preoperatively the patients had multiple sessions with the operating surgeons, where they were counseled, motivated and explained in details about TKA procedure, nature of implants and the outcomes of surgery.
Post-operatively, the patients were hospitalized for 1 week, during which time they received physiotherapy to achieve flexion of 90 and autonomous walking using canes or walker cages at discharge. TKA, rehabilitation, and other treatments were standardized according to hospital protocols. Patients were treated with low molecular weight heparin as prophylaxis for thromboembolic events for 1 month and 4 doses of cefuroxime, 1.5 g were administered as antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients were seen 15 days after surgery to check the surgical wound and remove staples. Follow-up at 1, 3, 6 months included radiography, clinical evaluation, motivation and counseling, medications, physiotherapy and questionnaire fill up. Home visits were performed when required. The results were tabulated at 6 month follow up. The type of major complications evaluated after discharge included: knee stiffness, deformity of the lower limb, pain, extensor muscle weakness, superficial infection and deep vein thrombosis.
Statistical analysis
The Mann–Whitney test was used to compare the QOL among patients with Walking Ability and Knee Range of Movements (satisfactory vs unsatisfactory) and patients with good surgical understanding (satisfactory vs unsatisfactory) at 1st, 3rd and 6th month after surgery. The independent-samples ‘t’ test was performed to compare two group’s scores on the same variable. The variables were tabulated in the Excel software. The data were analyzed descriptively and organized in tables and graphs. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The 95% confidence intervals were measured when appropriate. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Sample characterization
The sample composed of 168 knee in 154 patients: 72 men (46.75%) and 82 women (53.24%). 14 patients had a contralateral TKA during the course of the study: 9 men (64.28%) and 5 women (35.71%). The ages of the patients evaluated ranged from 62 years (minimum) to 92 years (maximum) with a mean of 76 ± 6 years.
Clinical factors
Among the patients evaluated; 96 patients (62.33%) were affected on their right-hand side and 44 patients (28.57%) were affected on their left-hand side. 14 patients (9.09%) had bilateral affection within 12 months of the first procedure during the course of the study. 114 patients (74.13%) were married, 40 patients (25.98%) were widowed and 45% patients were working at the time presentation to hospital. Among 168 knees; 12 knees (7.14%), had grade-II osteoarthritis, 88 knees (52.38%) had grade-III osteoarthritis and 68 knees (40.47%) had grade-IV osteoarthritis (Fig. 1) based on the radiological classification (Table 1). Preoperative Knee Range ofmovements, Educational status and comorbidities among the patients is outlined in Table 2. The most frequent were Diabetes mellitus in Females (62.1%) and Hypertension in Males (59.7%). Preoperatively, mean 10 MWT results for self-selected velocity was 0.2 m/s and Fast
velocity was 0.4 m/s. The patients had moderately low quality of life both physically and mentally, the baseline mean SF- 36 PCS was 33.2 and MCS was 35.4. Pre-operative Functional scores (WOMAC, Friedmann-Wyman Score, KSS, Walking Status Grading, 30 second timed chair test) and Pain and Mental Health scores (VAS, CES D10) are outlined in Table 3.
Postoperative Functional Knee Scores (WOMAC, Friedmann–Wyman Score, KSS, Walking Status Grading, 30 second timed chair test) and Pain and Mental Health scores
(VAS, CES D10) in Female and Male Knee at 1st, 3rd and 6th month are outlined in Tables 4 and 5. There were significant improvement in terms of KSS, Walking Status Grading, 30 second timed chair test, WOMAC scores, Friedmann–Wyman Scores, 10MWT, VAS and CES D10, postoperatively and over 1st (p = 0.02), 3rd (p = 0.04) and 6th (p = 0.02) month follow up. At 3rd month post-operatively, we found significant improvement in mean 10 MWT results for selfselected velocity which improved to 0.5 m/s and Fast velocity to 0.9 m/s (p < 0.01). The patients had moderately good quality of life both physically and mentally, the baseline mean SF-36 PCS was 47.4 and MCS was 59.2 (p < 0.01).
Patient’s motivation and understanding of surgical procedure were assessed by primary surgeons as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Patients with educational status Grade 9 and above had better compliance and involvement. This may be attributable to interest and activity levels in them.
Moreover, patients with better preoperative functional activity and satisfactory understanding of TKA, performed functionally well and lead good quality life at 1st, 3rd and 6th months (p < 0.01).
Osteoarthritis (OA), the most common joint disease, is age related, affecting more than 80% of people over the age of 55.21 It is more common in women, especially after menopause. OA of the knees is common, and risk is strongly linked to body mass index.21 Symptoms include pain with walking, standing up from a chair, climbing or descending stairs; and stiffness after periods of rest. With new or increased pain there is a natural tendency to reduce activity, so does muscle bulk and strength, which may lead to decreased joint stability, worsening of joint degeneration, and further decline in functional status which can have major systemic consequences, affecting cardiovascular health, emotional health, and sense of well-being. Breaking this cycle requires a team approach targeted toward educating the patient and family, altering the patient’s lifestyle, offering assistive devices, and prescribing both physical and pharmacotherapy.
The heterogeneity of osteoarthritis arises from the many factors that can contribute to cartilage damage. TKA is the most effective surgical procedure for reducing pain and increasing functional capacity, correct the deformity and improve the patient’s quality of life (QoL)4–8 when conservative treatment fails.9 In Canada, with 8,734 joint replacement surgeries in 2004–2005 to >10,000 in 2006–2007, estimated
figure is expected to be beyond 20,000 TJA by 2020 with an annual cost of $230 million.22 Various potential risk factors for persistent pain, functional limitations, and clinical dissatisfaction after successful elective orthopedic procedures are infection, instability, loosening of the prosthesis, increased waiting time for surgery,20 lack of surgical information, female gender,23 depression,15 anxiety,6,16,24 obesity19 and complex regional pain syndrome.
Hudak et al.25 outlined various assumptions that constrain patients against Total Joint Arthroplasties, i.e., firstly, some participants view osteoarthritis not as a disease but as normal part of aging. Secondly, despite being candidates for TJA according to medical criteria, many participants believed candidacy required a level of pain and disability higher than their current level. Thirdly, some participants believed that if they either required or would benefit from TJA, their physicians would advise surgery. For better post-surgical outcomes, these issues have to be addressed in surgeon-patient meetings preoperatively. The results of current study point to a conclusion that patients with active lifestyle, good preoperative walking ability, ROM and understanding of knee arthroplasty preoperatively had significant improvements in functional ability following TKA in early and late post-surgery periods as compared to patients with sedentary lifestyles with poor walking ability, knee stiffness and poor understanding ofTKA (p < 0.01). In spite of repeated attempts some patients fail to understand the intrigues ofthe surgical procedure probably due to their literacy levels, social tension, old age, ignorance or cognitive and comorbid limitations. These patients often have a poor preoperative walking ability and functional knee scores, are likely to be dissatisfied following TKA and involve less in post-surgical rehabilitation. Arthroplasty surgeons must be able to distinguish between patients with sedentary lifestyles, poor preoperative knee scores and understanding who are likely to have persistent pain and clinical dissatisfaction from those that are actually likely to improve with the joint replacement surgery. Surgeons may guide former group patients to appropriate nonsurgical interventions and physical training, allowing time for enhancing their quality oflife (physical, mental and social) before they are planned for surgical intervention.
Surgeons must also incorporate and address these components into discussions with TKA candidates and educate them regarding the surgical procedure, nature of implants and how the procedure would affect their lifestyle and what their expectations from TKA should be. These crucial considerations should boost their confidence; enhance their involvement and cooperation in post-surgical rehabilitation, thereby improving their QoL, functional results and post TKA experience.
Conclusion
TKA candidates with good preoperative walking ability and understanding ofknee arthroplasty have a better quality oflife (QoL) in early and late post-surgery periods. Patient’s lifestyle and understanding significantly enhances the postoperative functional ability.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest
1. Davis RT, Gorczyca JT, Pugh K. Supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Comparison of operative treatment methods. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;(376):49–55. 2. Wilkins KE. Fractures and dislocations of the elbow region. In: Rockwood CA, King RE, Wilkins KE, editors. Fractures in children. 3rd ed. New York: JB Lippincott; 1991. p. 526–617. 3. Cheng JC, Lam TP, Maffulli N. Epidemiological features of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in Chinese children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001;10(1):63–7. 4. Gartland JJ. Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1959;109(2):145–54. 5. Wilkins KE. Fractures and dislocations of the elbow region. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Wilkins KE, King RE, editors. Fractures in children. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven Publishers; 1996. p. 680. 6. O’Hara LJ, Barlow JW, Clarke NM. Displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Audit changes practice. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2000;82(2):204–10. 7. Skaggs DL, Mirzayan R. The posterior fat pad sign in association with occult fracture of the elbow in children. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1999;81(10):1429–33. 8. Leitch KK, Kay RM, Femino JD, Tolo VT, Storer SK, Skaggs DL. Treatment of multidirectionally unstable supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A modified Gartland type-IV fracture. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2006;88(5):980–5. 9. Buturovic S. Komparacija rezultata lijeèenja preloma distralnog humerusa kod djece prema indikaciji za konzervativno ili operativno rjesenje:doktorska? disertacija. Sarajevo: Univerzitet u Sarajevu, Medicinski fakultet; 2006. 10. Madjar-Simic I, Talic-Tanovic A, Hadziahmetovic Z, Sarac-Hadzihalilovic A. Radiographic assessment in the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Acta Inform Med. 2012;20(3):154–9. 11. Green DW, Widmann RF, Frank JS, Gardner MJ. Low incidence of ulnar nerve injury with crossed pin placement for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using a mini-open technique. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:158–63. 12. Krusche-Mandl I, Aldrian S, Köttstorfer J, Seis A, Thalhammer G, Egkher A. Crossed pinning in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis. Int Orthop. 2012;36(9):1893–8. 13. Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O’Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L’Abbé KA. Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(3):255–65. 14. Skaggs DL, Cluck MW, Mostofi A, Flynn JM, Kay RM. Lateral-entry pin fixation in the management of supracondylar fractures in children. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86(4):702–7. 15. Anwar W, Rahman N, Iqbal MJ, Khan MA. Comparison of two methods of percutaneous K-wire fixation in displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children. J Postgrad Med Inst. 2011;25:356–61. 16. Foead A, Penafort R, Saw A, Sengupta S. Comparison of two methods of percutaneous pin fixation in displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2004;12(1):76–82. 17. Gaston RG, Cates TB, Devito D, Schmitz M, Schrader T, Busch M, et al. Medial and lateral pin versus lateral-entry pin fixation for Type 3 supracondylar fractures in children: a prospective, surgeon-randomized study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(8):799–806. 18. Kocher MS, Kasser JR, Waters PM, Bae D, Snyder BD, Hresko MT, et al. Lateral entry compared with medial and lateral entry pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2007;89(4):706–12. 19. Maity A, Saha D, Roy DS. A prospective randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing medial and lateral entry pinning with lateral entry pinning for percutaneous fixation of displaced extension type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012;7:6. 20. Tripuraneni KR, Bosch PP, Schwend RM, Yaste JJ. Prospective, surgeon-randomized evaluation of crossed pins versus lateral pins for unstable supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2009;18(2):93–8. 21. Mazda K, Boggione C, Fitoussi F, Pennec¸ot GF. Systematic pinning of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. A prospective study of 116 consecutive patients. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2001;83(6): 888–93. 22. Vaidya SM. Percutaneous fixation of displaced supracondylar fracture in children comparing lateral with medial and lateral pin [thesis]. University of Seychelles: American Institute of Medicine; 2009. Available from: http://www.mch-orth.com/ pdf/Thesis%20by%20Dr.Sudeep%20Vaidya. 23. Babal JC, Mehlman CT, Klein G. Nerve injuries associated with pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(3):253–63. 24. Brauer CA, Lee BM, Bae DS, Waters PM, Kocher MS. A systematic review of medial and lateral entry pinning versus lateral entry pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(2):181–6. 25. Skaggs DL, Hale JM, Bassett J, Kaminsky C, Kay RM, Tolo VT. Operative treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. The consequences of pin placement. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2001;83(5):735–40. 26. Omid R, Choi PD, Skaggs DL. Supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2008;90(5):1121–32.
