ABSTRACT:

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microfracture intervention with tibial valgus osteotomy associated in the treatment of varus gonarthrosis.
METHODS: From November 2005 to May 2013, 129 patients with medial gonarthrosis, varus deformity (8°-12°), and range of movement greater than 90° were evaluated. Patients with advanced gonarthrosis (Alhbäck 3, 4, and 5), Outerbridge lesion inferior to IV, previous knee surgery, body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2, and/or cruciate ligament injuries were not included. All patients were treated with videoarthroscopy followed by tibial valgus osteotomy. In the group osteotomy associated with microfracture (n = 56, mean age = 39.3), tibial valgus osteotomy and microfracture techniques to address chondral defects were used. In the isolated osteotomy group (n = 73, mean age = 41.4), only this procedure was performed. Post-surgical follow-up was 24 months, with four evaluations in the first 6 months, proceeding to biannual twice-a-year evaluation in the subsequent period. The Lysholm scale was used for functional monitoring.
RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the pain, limping, and squatting domains of the Lysholm scale but only in the isolated osteotomy group. A greater variance of results was observed in the osteotomy group associated to microfracture, in addition to an increased risk of functional deterioration (OR = 8.64).
CONCLUSION: The association of microfractures and tibial valgus osteotomy was correlated to lower functional outcomes than tibial valgus osteotomy alone, and may be related to the risk of worsening in the first two postoperative years.

Keywords: Knee osteoarthritis; Genu varum; Osteotomy; Arthroscopy; Lysholm knee score.

RESUMO:

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a intervenção de microfratura associada a osteotomia tibial valgizante no tratamento de gonartrose medial com geno varo.
MÉTODOS: Entre novembro de 2005 e maio de 2013, foram avaliados 129 pacientes portadores de gonartrose medial, geno varo entre 8° e 12° e arco de movimento superior a 90°. Não foram incluídos pacientes com gonartrose avançada (Alhbäck 3, 4 e 5), lesão Outerbridge inferior a IV, cirurgia prévia na articulação, índice de massa corpórea superior a 35 kg/m2 e/ou lesão de ligamentos cruzados. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a videoartroscopia do joelho seguida de osteotomia tibial valgizante. No grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante associado a microfratura (n = 56, média de idade = 39,3) foram associadas as técnicas de osteotomia tibial valgizante e microfratura nos defeitos condrais. No grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante isolada (n = 73, média de idade = 41,4), apenas esse procedimento foi feito. O acompanhamento pós-cirúrgico foi de 24 meses, com quatro avaliações ambulatoriais nos primeiros seis meses, passou-se a avaliações semestrais no período subsequente. A escala de Lysholm foi usada no acompanhamento funcional.
RESULTADOS: Uma melhoria significativa nos domínios dor, claudicação e agachamento da escala de Lysholm foi observada apenas no grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante isolada. Maior variância de resultados foi observada no grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante associada a microfratura e uma razão de chances de pioria de 8,64.
CONCLUSÃO: A associação das microfraturas e osteotomia tibial valgizante tem resultado funcional inferior à osteotomia tibial valgizante isolada, pode ainda estar relacionada ao risco de pioria nos primeiros dois anos de pós-operatório.

Palavras-chave: Osteoartrite do joelho; Geno varo; Osteotomia; Artroscopia; Escore de Lysholm para joelho.

FIGURES

Citation: Souza LAB, Rocha VM, Ramos MRF. The role of microfractures with tibial osteotomy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with a varus deformity. 53(6):754. doi:10.1016/j.rboe.2017.08.023
Note: Study conducted at Hospital Universitário Gaffrée e Guinle, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Received: May 4 2017; Accepted: August 24 2017
 

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthrosis is among the main diseases responsible for reducing the quality of life in the elderly, and the knee is the most affected joint.1,2 Risk factors for the development of this pathology include heredity, obesity, fractures, and angular deviations.3 The disease commonly begins in the medial compartment and is closely related to limb alignment.4 The presence of varus of the lower limb, for example, is not only an isolated risk factor for the onset of gonarthrosis but also accelerates disease progression among those patients who already present joint degeneration and have a limb misalignment.5

Changes in the medial compartment are observed early in young adults who will develop the disease. In these patients, the presence of varus associated with focal joint defects, joint instability, and/or medial meniscectomy may accelerate joint deterioration in an active phase of life, when the joint is still quite biomechanically required.4,5

Despite the advances in unicompartmental arthroplasty techniques, studies have shown that young adults with an active lifestyle who present medial gonarthrosis obtain greater long-term benefits from joint-sparing procedures.6,7 It has also been well-established that good joint alignment is paramount for the success of joint preservation techniques, such as osteochondral transplantation, autologous chondrocyte transplantation, abrasion arthroplasty, and microfractures.8,9 Thus, in patients with varus in whom it is desirable to postpone the arthroplasty, realignment is an important step in the surgical treatment.

Many studies have evaluated the results of tibial valgus osteotomy (TVO) for genu varum with early signs of medial compartment arthrosis, and have reported that the good results obtained postpone the need for arthroplasty.9-13 However, there are few reports in the literature that assess the functional outcome of the TVO technique in the short and medium-terms.5

This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical and functional benefits of the intervention of the microfracture technique in patients who underwent TVO for the treatment of angular deviations in varus and gonarthrosis of the medial compartment.

 

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study in which patients with genu varum and medial gonarthrosis underwent knee video arthroscopy, followed by TVO with or without microfracture. The patients were operated between November 2005 and May 2013. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Center for Biological Sciences and Health of this institution under CAAE No. 51547415.5.0000.5258.

Case selection

A total of 129 patients between 18 and 70 years of age were included in the study, and the selection criteria listed in Table 1 were observed. The information contained in the medical charts and the images were obtained from the institution's image bank.

Table 1. Sample selection criteria.
Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria
Medial gonarthrosis Advanced gonarthrosis
(Alhback 1 and 2) (Alhback 3, 4, and 5)
Genu varum between 8° and 10° Prior surgery in the joint
Range of motion >90° Body mass index >35 kg/m2
Age between 18 and 70 years Injury of crossed ligaments
Table 1. Sample selection criteria.

The radiographic classification of Ahlbäck and Rydberg,14 modified by Keyes et al.,15 was used for gonarthrosis classification. Panoramic orthostatic radiographs were used to assess the lower limb axis and to quantify the varus deviation.

Surgical technique

In the selected cases, knee arthroscopy was performed before TVO. Parapatellar portals were used for joint inspection. Chondral lesions were identified and graded by the Outerbridge classifications.16 Patients with cruciate ligament injuries, Outerbridge chondral lesions graded less than 4, and full-thickness chondral lesions without a border were excluded from the study. Degenerative meniscal lesions were duly addressed and stabilized when necessary.17

The microfracture technique described by Steadman et al.18 was used. In this procedure, peripheral fragments of the chondral lesion are removed, as well as the entire residual calcified cartilage layer; 3-4-mm deep holes are made in the subchondral bone, with an average distance of 4-5 mm from each other. Patients who underwent the microfracture technique were included in the TVO + microfracture group.

All study participants underwent TVO, with medial vertical access in the proximal tibia between the anterior tibial tuberosity and its posterior medial border, followed by periosteum en bloc dissection until the posterior tibial cortex could be visualized. Guidewires (2.5 mm Steinmann wires) are positioned approximately 4 cm from the articular surface, towards the superior portion of the proximal fibular head, with radioscopic aid. The osteotomy is then performed, preserving the lateral cortex because its integrity functions as a fulcrum for the osteotomy. The opening is previously calculated using the Dugdale et al.19 method, and a second preoperative control is made using a tuning fork that keeps the osteotomy open and with the aid of radioscopy and a metal wire positioned from the centre of the femoral head to the centre of the ankle through the point of Noyes et al.,20 located in the lateral compartment of the knee (point corresponding to 62.5% assessed from the medial proximal tibia). A hydroxyapatite graft is placed, followed by the Tomofix plate (AO Synthes®) with eight locking screws. A Hemovac® drain was used in all patients, who were discharged 24 h after surgery with partial weight-bearing and a long knee immobilizer for analgesia during the first week; after that, knee range of motion exercises were indicated. Patients who underwent only the TVO procedure were included in the isolated TVO group in this study.

Postoperative follow-up

In the postoperative period, patients were regularly followed-up at outpatient appointments for 2 years. In the first 6 months after the procedure, four appointments were carried out, and half-yearly evaluations were performed thereafter. The Lysholm functional score21 was used to follow-up the clinical and functional evolution at four moments: at the time of admission to the surgical treatment, and at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Radiographs were systematically used to confirm bone consolidation; this was the criterion for authorizing weight-bearing on the operated knee. All the patients selected evolved with osteotomy consolidation before the first clinical and functional evaluation in the postoperative period, with a correction of 5 degrees of valgus of the mechanical axis.

 

RESULTS

Among the selected patients, 32 were female and 97 were male. The age ranged from 18 to 67 years in the isolated TVO group (mean of 39.3) and in the TVO + microfracture group, from 18 to 62 years (mean of 41.4). No differences were observed between the groups in relation to the age group (p-value: 0.280, Student's t-test).

The Lysholm score results and the statistics used in the total score and its domains are listed in Table 2. The coefficients of variation demonstrated that the variability of scores was relatively higher in the TVO + microfracture group. In all evaluations, in both groups, the variables did not follow a normal distribution, as all normality tests resulted in p-values lower than 0.001.

Table 2. Statistics used in Lysholm score analyses.
pan="1" colspan="1">0.4 ; colspan="1"> 
Lysholm Statistics Isolated TVO group   TVO + microfracture group
    Preop 6th m 12th m 18th m   Preop 6th m 12th m 18th m
Limping Mean 3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8   3.5 4.2 4.2 4.2
Md. 3 5 5 5   3 5 5 5
σ 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6   0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1
Min. 3 3 3 3   3 0 0 0
Max. 5 5 5 5   4 5   5
CV 0.24 0.11 0.11 0.12   0.25 0.27 0.26 0.27
Support Mean 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.8   4.1 4.7 4.7 4.6
Md. 5 5 5 5   5 5 5 5
σ 0.8 0.40.7  1.1 0.9 0.9 1
Min. 2 2 2 2   2 2 2 2
Max. 5 5 5 5   5 5 5 5
CV 0.17 0.09 0.09 0.15   0.24 0.2 0.2 0.22
Locking Mean 7.3 14.2 14.3 14.2   8.6 13.9 13.9 13.7
Md. 6 15 15 15   10 15 15 15
σ 2.7 1.9 1.7 1.9   2.6 2.4 2.4 2.5
Min. 2 10 10 10   6 6 6 6
Max. 10 15 15 15   15 15 15 15
CV 0.37 0.13 0.12 0.13   0.3 0.17 0.17 0.18
Instability Mean 17.1 23.8 23.8 23.8   18.5 23.1 23.1 23.1
Md. 20 25 25 25   20 25 25 25
σ 3.5 2.2 2.1 2.1   2.7 3.8 3.8 3.8
Min. 10 20 20 20   15 10 10 10
Max. 20 25 25 25   25 25 25 25
CV 0.21 0.09 0.09 0.09   0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16
Pain Mean 13.2 21.7 21.8 21.7   13.3 19.7 19.3 19.2
Md. 15 20 20 20   15 20 20 20
σ 2.7 3.8 3.9 4   2.4 5.1 5.3 5.4
Min. 10 10 10 10   10 5 5 5
Max. 15 25 25 25   15 25 25 25
CV 0.2 0.18 0.18 0.18   0.18 0.26 0.28 0.28
Swelling Mean 6.3 9.3 9.3 9.5   7.6 9.1 8.8 8.7
Md. 6 10 10 10   6 10 10 10
σ 2.9 1.7 1.6 1.5   2.5 1.8 2 2
Min. 2 2 2 2   2 2 2 2
Max. 10 10 10 10   10 10 10 10
CV 0.46 0.18 0.17 0.16   0.33 0.2 0.23 0.23
Climbing stairs Mean 5.9 8.1 8.6 8.8   6 7.9 8.1 8.2
Md. 6 10 10 10   6 10 10 10
σ 0.7 2 1.9 1.8   0.76 2.3 2.3 2.3
Min. 2 6 6 6   2 2 2 2
Max. 6 10 10 10   10 10 10 10
CV 0.11 0.25 0.22 0.21   0.13 0.29 0.28 0.28
Squatting Mean 3.3 4.7 4.7 4.7   3.5 4.4 4.4 4.5
Md. 4 5 5 5   4 5 5 5
σ 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.7   0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8
Min. 2 2 2 2   2 2 2 2
Max. 4 5 5 5   4 5 5 5
CV 0.34 0.16 0.16 0.16   0.26 0.2 0.2 0.17
Total value Mean 60.8 91.5 92.3 92.3   65.5 87.1 86.5 86.3
Md. 64 95 95 95   67 90 89 89
σ 7 7.7 8 8.8   5.2 12.1 12.7 12.8
Min. 46 65 65 62   51 48 48 50
Max. 70 100 100 100   73 100 100 100
CV 0.12 0.08 0.09 0.09   0.08 0.14 0.15 0.15

σ, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variance; m, month; Max., maximum value; Md., median; Min., minimum value.

Table 2. Statistics used in Lysholm score analyses.

The difference between the mean values of total Lysholm scores and its domains, preoperatively, between the TVO + microfracture and isolated TVO groups, was not statistically significant (p > 0.05 by Mann-Whitney's test). A significant improvement in the scores was observed in both groups after surgery (Table 2) and during the postoperative period (p < 0.05 by Mann-Whitney's test), with higher values in the isolated TVO group. Comparing the studied groups in the postoperative period, it was observed that the improvement obtained was significant in the total values, but only for the limping, pain, and squatting domains (Table 3 and Fig. 1).

Table 3. Comparison of the means of the Lysholm score in the postoperative period by the Mann-Whitney test.
Lysholm scale domains 6th month 12th month 18th month
Limping 0 0 0
Support 0.059 0.059 0.261
Locking 0.579 0.329 0.297
Instability 0.659 0.539 0.539
Pain 0.023 0.006 0.006
Swelling 0.637 0.066 0.007
Climbing stairs 0.713 0.329 0.159
Squatting 0.024 0.009 0.018
Total score 0.022 0.004 0.002
Table 3. Comparison of the means of the Lysholm score in the postoperative period by the Mann-Whitney test.
Fig. 1. Comparison between groups in the postoperative period.

A study of frequency distribution of the mean postoperative Lysholm score classification (poor, fair, good, excellent) was also assessed. In the isolated TVO group, between the 6th and 12th month, 90.4% of the patients remained in the same categories, 8.2% improved, and 1.4% worsened, a statistically significant difference (p-value: 0.03; McNemar test; Table 4). In the TVO + microfracture group, in the same period, 89.3% of the patients remained in the same categories, 1.8% improved, and 8.9% got worse, a statistically significant difference (p-value: 0.049; McNemar test; Table 5).

Table 4. Distribution of categorical frequencies between the 6th and 12th months in the isolated TVO group.
First evaluation (6th month)
  Second evaluation (12th month)
  Excellent Good Regular Total
Excellent 39 0 0 39
  53.40% 0.00% 0.00% 53.40%
Good 6 17 1 24
  8.20% 23.30% 1.40% 32.90%
Regular 0 0 10 10
  0.00% 0.00% 13.70% 13.70%
Total 45 17 11 73
  61.60% 23.30% 15.10% 100.00%
Table 4. Distribution of categorical frequencies between the 6th and 12th months in the isolated TVO group.
Table 5. Distribution of categorical frequencies between the 6th and 12th months in the TVO + microfracture group.
First evaluation (6th month)
  Second evaluation (12th month)
  Excellent Good Regular Poor Total
Excellent 19 0 0 0 19
  33.90% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 33.90%
Good 1 20 5 0 26
  1.80% 35.70% 8.90% 0.00% 46.40%
Regular 0 0 7 0 7
  0.00% 0.00% 12.50% 0.00% 12.50%
Poor 0 0 0 4 4
  0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 7.20% 7.20%
Total 20 20 12 4 56
  35.70% 35.70% 21.40% 7.20% 100.00%
Table 5. Distribution of categorical frequencies between the 6th and 12th months in the TVO + microfracture group.

The odds ratio for improvement in the TVO + microfracture group was 0.2, i.e., a patient who underwent microfracture had a reduced chance of improvement when compared with a patient who underwent isolated TVO, but the confidence interval of the odds ratio for improvement does not show its significance, as it contains the value 1 (0.02; 1.7). In turn, the odds ratio for worsening was 8.64 in the TVO + microfracture group, and the confidence interval of the odds ratio for worsening shows its significance, as it does not include the value 1 (1.1; 74.0).

Analyzing the frequency distribution of 129 patients between the 12th and 18th months, 95.3% (123 patients) remained in the same classification, only 0.8% (one patient) improved from good to excellent, and 2.3% (three patients) worsened from good to regular. These changes were not statistically significant (p-value: 0.112; McNemar test). The most significant changes in patient status were observed between the 6th and 18th months, especially in the isolated TVO group.

 

DISCUSSION

The literature describes different strategies for the treatment of chondral defects.2 These include the creation of microfractures in the defective bed, which has been frequently used in the management of symptomatic chondral defects of the knee joint.2,4,5,7,8,18 This technique induces the formation of fibrocartilage through mesenchymal cells migrated from the subchondral space.18 It is a simple and reproducible technique, with low morbidity.

The prevalence of chondral lesions of the medial compartment in patients with genu varum is high11,12; they are related to the pathophysiological process of medial gonarthrosis. TVO is a proven technique for the treatment of genu varum in patients who do not yet meet criteria for TKA.9-11,13,19,20 Recent studies have associated the TVO and microfracture techniques aiming to delay the onset of medial gonarthrosis and improve short and medium-term joint function.5

In this case series, only patients with symptomatic genu varum with medial chondral lesion were selected. All patients underwent TVO aiming to reduce the overload on the medial compartment. Patients from the TVO + microfracture group underwent microfractures in the areas of chondral defects; better results were expected with the association of the two techniques, but this outcome was not observed.

There are few reports in the literature that have evaluated the functional outcomes of the association between TVO and microfracture.22-25 Akizuki et al.23 concluded that fibrocartilage formation occurs within the first postoperative year and has limited functional benefits; the clinical short and medium-term outcome is associated with an improvement in the dynamic factors related to TVO. Much has been discussed about the correlation between the formation of fibrocartilage after the creation of microfractures and the functional improvement observed postoperatively,22,23,26,27 but to date, it has not been possible to associate the clinical and functional benefits with the correction of a chondral defect (Jung et al.28). The present study did not assess fibrocartilage formation, but it was clear that the association of microfracture with TVO had a deleterious effect, increasing the chances of functional worsening, especially for the domains of limping, pain, and squatting.

The authors believe that the functional improvement observed in both groups was due to limb realignment, which reduces the impact on the subchondral bone, reducing the intravenous pressure, which in turn reduces the microfracture of the subchondral bone. The present results are consistent with those of other authors who assessed the role of TVO in the progression of gonarthrosis.10,19,20,26

In the present study, no difference was observed between the groups in relation to age, but the variance within each group was significant and may have interfered in this outcome; nonetheless, both groups presented better results when compared with the preoperative period, confirming the importance of limb realignment in clinical short and medium-term improvement.

The Lysholm score is a subjective evaluation; ideally, it should be associated with other methods to increase the predictive value. The Lysholm score was used because it was the only one validated for the Brazilian population at the beginning of this research. The present authors agree with Albuquerque et al.29 that this evaluation system has a low negative predictive value and underestimates the score of patients with normal knees.

The retrospective design, the small number of patients, and the lack of radiographic and arthroscopic evaluation of the chondral defects in the postoperative period are limitations of the present study, especially in defining the benefits of TVO + microfracture.

 

CONCLUSION

The TVO + microfracture group presented a lower functional benefit than the isolated TVO group and had a greater chance of getting worse in relation to preoperative conditions.

 

REFERENCES

1
Andrianakos AA, Kontelis LK, Karamitsos DG, Aslanidis SI, Georgountzos AI, Kaziolas GO, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic knee, hand, and hip osteoarthritis in Greece. The ESORDIG study. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(12):2507-13. Link PubMed
2
Brody LT. Knee osteoarthritis: clinical connections to articular cartilage structure and function. Phys Ther Sport. 2015;16(4):301-16. Link DOI Link PubMed
3
Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD, Reinke EK, Huston LJ, Spindler KP. Risk factors and predictors of subsequent ACL injury in either knee after ACL reconstruction: prospective analysis of 2488 primary ACL reconstructions from the MOON cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1583-90. Link DOI Link PubMed
4
Fibel KH, Hillstrom HJ, Halpern BC. State-of-the-art management of knee osteoarthritis. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(2):89-101. Link DOI Link PubMed
5
Schuster P, Schulz M, Mayer P, Schlumberger M, Immendoerfer M, Richter J. Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and combined abrasion/microfracture in severe medial osteoarthritis and varus malalignment: 5-year results and arthroscopic findings after 2 years. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(7):1279-88. Link DOI Link PubMed
6
Lynch TS, Patel RM, Benedick A, Amin NH, Jones MH, Miniaci A. Systematic review of autogenous osteochondral transplant outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(4):746-754. Link DOI Link PubMed
7
Hawi N, Haasper C. Long-term results after microfracture treatment for full-thickness knee chondral lesions in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:1986-96, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2676-8. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(4):1268–9. Link DOI
8
Oussedik S, Tsitskaris K, Parker D. Treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee by microfracture or autologous chondrocyte implantation: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(4):732-44. Link DOI Link PubMed
9
Duivenvoorden T, Brouwer RW, Baan A, Bos PK, Reijman M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, et al. Comparison of closing-wedge and opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial with a six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(17):1425-32. Link DOI Link PubMed
10
Coventry MB. Proximal tibial varus osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(1):32-8. Link DOI Link PubMed
11
Keene JS, Dyreby JR. High tibial osteotomy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. The role of preoperative arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(1):36-42. Link DOI Link PubMed
12
Khan FA, Koff MF, Noiseux NO, Bernhardt KA, O'Byrne MM, Larson DR, et al. Effect of local alignment on compartmental patterns of knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(9):1961-9. Link DOI Link PubMed
13
Prodromos CC, Amendola A, Jakob RP. High tibial osteotomy: indications, techniques, and postoperative management. Instr Course Lect. 2015;64:555-65. Link PubMed
14
Ahlbäck S, Rydberg J. X-ray classification and examination technics in gonarthrosis. Lakartidningen. 1980;77(22):2091-3. 2096. Link PubMed
15
Keyes GW, Carr AJ, Miller RK, Goodfellow JW. The radiographic classification of medial gonarthrosis. Correlation with operation methods in 200 knees. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;63(5):497-501. Link DOI Link PubMed
16
Cameron ML, Briggs KK, Steadman JR. Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(1):83-6. Link DOI Link PubMed
17
Biedert RM. Treatment of intrasubstance meniscal lesions: a randomized prospective study of four different methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(2):104-8. Link DOI Link PubMed
18
Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ. Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391(Suppl):S362-9. Link DOI
19
Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D. Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;(274):248-64. Link PubMed
20
Noyes FR, Goebel SX, West J. Opening wedge tibial osteotomy: the 3-triangle method to correct axial alignment and tibial slope. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(3):378-87. Link DOI Link PubMed
21
Celik D, Coşkunsu D, Kiliçoğlu O. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Turkish Lysholm knee scale: ease of use, validity, and reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(8):2602-10. Link DOI Link PubMed
22
Matsunaga D, Akizuki S, Takizawa T, Yamazaki I, Kuraishi J. Repair of articular cartilage and clinical outcome after osteotomy with microfracture or abrasion arthroplasty for medial gonarthrosis. Knee. 2007;14(6):465-71. Link DOI Link PubMed
23
Akizuki S, Yasukawa Y, Takizawa T. Does arthroscopic abrasion arthroplasty promote cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritic knees with eburnation? A prospective study of high tibial osteotomy with abrasion arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy alone. Arthroscopy. 1997;13(1):9-17. Link DOI Link PubMed
24
Pascale W, Luraghi S, Perico L, Pascale V. Do microfractures improve high tibial osteotomy outcome?. Orthopedics. 2011;34(7):e251-5. Link PubMed
25
McCulloch PC, Kang RW, Sobhy MH, Hayden JK, Cole BJ. Prospective evaluation of prolonged fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation of the femoral condyle: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(3):411-20. Link DOI Link PubMed
26
Koshino T, Wada S, Ara Y, Saito T. Regeneration of degenerated articular cartilage after high tibial valgus osteotomy for medial compartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee. 2003;10(3):229-36. Link DOI Link PubMed
27
Bergenudd H, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I, Lohmander LS. The articular cartilage after osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis. Biopsies after 2 years in 19 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;63(4):413-6. Link DOI Link PubMed
28
Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW, Lee JS, Jeong JH. Comparison of results of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with and without subchondral drilling. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(4):673-9. Link DOI Link PubMed
29
Albuquerque RP, Giordano V, Calixto A, Malzac F, Aguiar C, Amaral NP, et al. Análise do protocolo funcional de Lysholm modificado em pacientes com joelhos normais. Rev Bras Ortop. 2011;46(6):668-74. Link DOI