ABSTRACT:
OBJECTIVE The present study aims to evaluate the ability of triple arthrodesis in
eliminating the main complaints presented by patients with adult acquired
flatfoot deformity (AAFD): 1) disabling hindfoot pain; 2) major deformities,
such as medial arch collapse, valgus, abduction, and supination.
METHODS A total of 17 patients (20 feet) with advanced AAFD who underwent surgical
correction by triple arthrodesis were evaluated after a mean follow-up
period of 43 months (range: 18–84 months). The average age of the patients
at surgery was 62 years old (range: 38–79 years old). The visual analogue
scale (VAS) for pain and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society
(AOFAS) hindfoot score were used to assess the final results.
RESULTS According to the VAS, the average residual pain was 3 points; the AOFAS
hindfoot score points increased 23% after the surgery; and the correction of
deformities was considered satisfactory in 10 out of 20 feet; partially
satisfactory in 4 out of 20 feet; partially unsatisfactory in 5 out of 20
feet; and unsatisfactory in 1 out of 20 feet.
CONCLUSION Despite the high index of bone fusion after triple arthrodesis, which is the
gold standard treatment in advanced AAFD, the incomplete correction of major
deformities and the persistence of residual pain contributed to a high
disappointment rate of the patients with the surgical results.
Keywords: flatfoot/etiology; flatfoot/surgery; arthrodesis; acquired foot deformities.
RESUMO:
OBJETIVO Avaliar a capacidade da artrodese tríplice de aliviar as principais queixas
dos pacientes que apresentam pé plano adquirido do adulto (PPAA): 1) dor
incapacitante localizada no médio e retropé; 2) deformidades marcadas pelo
colapso do arco medial, valgo, abdução e supinação.
MÉTODO Avaliamos 17 pacientes (20 pés) portadores de PPAA em estado avançado que
foram submetidos à correção cirúrgica pela artrodese tríplice modelante. A
média de idade dos pacientes no momento da cirurgia foi de 62 anos (variação
de 38 a 79 anos), e o tempo médio de seguimento foi de 43 meses (variação de
18 a 84 meses). Utilizamos critérios clínicos empregando a escala visual
analógica da dor (EVAD) e a escala funcional da American Orthopaedic Foot
and Ankle Society (AOFAS, na sigla em inglês) do retropé para avaliar a
eficácia da cirurgia.
RESULTADOS A dor residual mensurada pela EVAD foi de três pontos, em média. Observamos
incremento médio de 23% nos valores da escala AOFAS do retropé após o
tratamento cirúrgico. A correção das deformidades foi satisfatória em 10 de
20 pés; parcialmente satisfatória em 4 de 20 pés; parcialmente
insatisfatória em 5 de 20 pés; e insatisfatória em 1 de 20 pés.
CONCLUSÃO Apesar da artrodese tríplice modelante indicada no tratamento do PPAA em
estágio avançado apresentar alto índice de consolidação óssea, a correção
incompleta das deformidades pré-existentes e a persistência de dor residual
contribuíram para a elevada taxa de decepção dos pacientes com o resultado
da cirurgia.
Palavras-chave: pé chato/etiologia; pé chato/cirurgia; artrodese; deformidades adquiridas do pé.
FIGURES
| Citation: Gobbo DKP, Severino NR, Ferreira RC. What is the Prognosis of Triple Arthrodesis in the Treatment of Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity (AAFD)?*. 54(3):275. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1692445 |
| Note: * The present work was developed at the Foot and Ankle Surgery Group, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. |
| Received: January 01 2019; Accepted: March 29 2019 |
INTRODUCTION
Triple modeling arthrodesis is the standard surgical treatment for advanced stages of adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD), as in stage III lesions. In this situation, joint stiffness is frequently associated with diffuse hindfoot arthrosis and is accompanied by typical deformities, including: 1) medial arch collapse; 2) hindfoot valgus; 3) forefoot abduction and supination.1-8 Triple arthrodesis is also indicated for older or overweight patients even when the evolutionary stage of AAFD is still intermediate (stage II), in which surgeries preserving some degree of joint movement would be performed.8-13 In obese patients, corrective surgeries involving osteotomies associated with musculotendinous transfers present a greater chance of failure with recurrences.8,12 Similarly, patients who are older and present low functional demand may also be good candidates for triple arthrodesis, since this surgery would theoretically contribute to alleviate the painful symptoms and is associated with a low risk of recurrence of deformities, thus avoiding a possible reoperation.8-16
The present study aims to evaluate the ability of modeling triple arthrodesis in relieving AAFD-related painful symptoms and deformities. Our hypothesis is that this surgery is capable of providing substantial improvement in pain intensity and in the alignment of deformed extremities.
CASUISTRY AND METHOD
From January to March 2015, all of the patients registered at our hospital database with a diagnosis of AAFD who were submitted to surgical treatment with triple modeling arthrodesis were called. Patients diagnosed with associated rheumatologic diseases and those whose minimum postoperative follow-up time was < 12 months were excluded. A total of 17 patients (15 females and 2 males) answered our call. The surgery was bilateral in 3 patients, totaling 20 operated feet. At the time of the surgery, the average age of the patients was 62 years old (ranging from 38 to 79 years old), and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 31 (ranging from 23 to 42). All of the patients underwent conventional surgery under spinal anesthesia, using a pneumatic tourniquet at the thigh, near the groin area, with a pressure of 300 mm Hg. The surgical access route was double, one lateral and one medial. After planar dissection, the subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneal cuboid joints were identified, and, then, proper-sized bone wedges were removed from the joint surfaces to allow an adequate coaptation concurrent to the correction of the essential AAFD-related deformities. All of the cases were internally fixed with screws. Immobilization with a plastered boot was maintained for 12 weeks. Loading on the operated limb was allowed from the 7th week on. After the removal of the plaster, immobilization with a walking boot was indicated for an additional 4 weeks, during which time the patients started physical therapy sessions.
During the postoperative follow-up period, minor complications were identified in five feet, including operative wound dehiscence and partial cutaneous necrosis at the edges of the surgical incision. The treatment of these lesions consisted of local debridement associated with oral systemic antibiotic therapy, resulting in complete healing without major complications.
To evaluate the clinical-functional outcome of the treatment, we used the corrected American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale for the hindfoot17,18 (preoperative variation, 0 to 100; and postoperative variation, 0 to 94); the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain19; and the degree of patient satisfaction with the outcome of the treatment (completely satisfied/satisfied with minimal restrictions/satisfied with major restrictions/unsatisfied).
To assess the surgical correction of the major AAFD-related clinical deformities, an independent examiner measured and compared preoperative photographic images of the feet of the patients with the clinical data from the postoperative evaluation. Variation in the degree of arch collapse, hindfoot valgus, and abduction and supination of the middle foot and forefoot were carefully analyzed and their correction was classified by the examiner as: 1) completely satisfactory, when the four deformities were adequately corrected according to normal clinical parameters; 2) partially satisfactory, when at least three of the four deformities were considered adequately corrected; 3) partially unsatisfactory, when only two of the four deformities were considered adequately corrected; and 4) completely unsatisfactory, when only one or no deformity among the four deformities was adequately corrected (► Fig. 1).
In addition to the clinical criteria, radiographic criteria were also used to evaluate the ability of triple modeling arthrodesis in correcting the main AAFD-related deformities.20,21 In simple radiographic images performed with support in dorsoplantar, lateral, and axial leg-foot views, the pre- and postoperative difference of the following parameters was measured: 1) medial longitudinal plantar arch height; 2) hindfoot valgus inclination; 3) forefoot abduction inclination (► Fig. 2).
The present study was approved by our institution under the number CAAE 43134015.0.0000.5479.
RESULTS
Complete bone consolidation, marked by bone trabeculae crossing the arthrodesis site on radiographic images, was observed in 19 of the 20 operated feet (95%). Despite the high consolidation rate, the surgery did not guarantee total elimination of the pain. The results of the VAS evaluation showed residual pain in an intensity of 3 out of 10 points (range: 0–6). Regarding the clinical-functional result, determined with the AOFAS hindfoot scale, an average increase of 18 points occurred after the surgery. The mean preoperative score increased from 56 out of 100 points (rang: 43–69) to 74 out of 94 points (range: 55–90). This proportional increase in the score corresponded to the proportional improvement of ~ 23% in the parameters measured by the AOFAS scale from the preoperative to the postoperative condition. Considering the satisfaction of the patients with the surgical result, complete satisfaction was reported in 7 feet (35%); satisfaction with minimal restrictions in 5 feet (25%); and satisfaction with major restrictions in 8 feet (40%). No patient was unsatisfied with the final result of the treatment (► Table 1).
| Case | Gender, age, side | ClassificationGRADE II or III | BMI | Immediate/Late Complications | Follow-up time | AOFASPRE/POST | VAS | Personal satisfaction | Deformity correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F, 52, R/L | II | 31.1/24.8 | no | 48 and 18 months | 67 to 72 and 73 | 5 and 5 | Minor restriction | Partial satisfaction/Total satisfaction |
| 2 | F, 54, L | II | 39.6 | no | 24 months | 52 to73 | 4 | Satisfied | Total satisfaction |
| 3 | F, 75, L | II | 27.3 | no | 30 months | 57 to 80 | 3 | Satisfied | Total satisfaction |
| 4 | F, 47, L | II | 31.8 | no | 47 months | 55 to 81 | 2 | Major restriction | Total satisfaction |
| 5 | F, 68, L | II | 27.5 | no | 49 months | 69 to 80 | 0 | Satisfied | Total satisfaction |
| 6 | F, 63, R | II | 22.9 | no | 84 months | 62 to 83 | 3 | Satisfied | Partial unsatisfaction |
| 7 | F, 49, L | III | 41.9 | no | 12 months | 56 to 75 | 2 | Satisfied | Total satisfaction |
| 8 | F, 75, R | III | 24.2 | SWD | 12 months | 43 to 70 | 2 | Satisfied | Partial unsatisfaction |
| 9 | F, 69, L | III | 42.0 | no | 24 months | 58 to 78 | 6 | Major restriction | Total satisfaction |
| 10 | F, 70, R/L | III | 38.7/38.7 | no | 24 and 48 months | 55 to 85 and 52 to 90 | 4 and 4 | Minor restriction | Total satisfaction/Partial satisfaction |
| 11 | M,79,R/L | III | 25.0/25.0 | no | 26 and 72 months | 58 to 81 and 51 to 80 | 3 and 3 | Major restriction | Total satisfaction/Partial satisfaction |
| 12 | F, 45, L | III | 35.2 | SWD | 35 months | 57 to 65 | 0 | Major restriction | Total satisfaction |
| 13 | F, 70, L | III | 33.2 | no | 43 months | 44 to 55 | 3 | Major restriction | Partial unsatisfaction |
| 14 | F, 70, R | III | 30.1 | SWD and pseudarthrosis | 48 months | 49 to 55 | 3 | Minor restriction | Unsatisfactory |
| 15 | F, 61, L | III | 31.0 | no | 60 months | 46 to 76 | 2 | Satisfied | Partial unsatisfaction |
| 16 | F, 58, R | III | 26.5 | SWD | 75 months | 66 to 73 | 3 | Major restriction | Partial unsatisfaction |
| 17 | M, 38, L | III | 24.0 | no | 90 months | 54 to 62 | 5 | Major restriction | Partial satisfaction |
Abbreviations: AOFAS, numeric scale for clinical and functional hindfoot evaluation of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society; BMI, body mass index; F, female; L, left, M, male; R, right; SWD, surgical wound dehiscence; VAS, visual analog scale for pain.
According to the clinical evaluation of the examiner regarding the surgical correction of the main AAFD-related deformities, the results were completely satisfactory in 10 out of 20 feet (50%), partially satisfactory in 4 out of 20 feet (20%), partially unsatisfactory in 5 out of 20 feet (25%), and completely unsatisfactory in 1 out of 20 feet (5%) (► Table 1).
In the radiographic evaluation of the surgical correction of the main AAFD-related deformities, the results were: 1) the average percentage increase in the medial longitudinal plantar arch height after the surgery was of 34%; 2) the mean percentage hindfoot valgus decrease was of 27% (from the preoperative mean angulation of 11º to the postoperative value of 8º); 3) the mean percentage forefoot abduction inclination decrease was of 80% (from the preoperative mean angulation of 15º to the postoperative value of 3º).
DISCUSSION
The incidence of AAFD is high; the condition affects patients in the 4th and 5th decades of life, who are overweight and poorly active, and is predominant in females.22-27 The main complaint of these patients is disabling pain, while the deformities that accompany AAFD appear as secondary complaints, mainly related to the difficulty in accommodating the foot inside conventional shoes, in addition to their excessive wear due to the support at its medial sole. The principle of surgical treatment considers that the improvement of the clinical symptoms depends on the correction of the deformities and on the restoration of the inverting force of the foot. In recent years, a number of publications involving studies with a series of clinical cases (level IV of scientific evidence) have highlighted the importance of replacing the degenerated posterior tibial tendon and correcting the typical AAFD deformities by multiple corrective osteotomies, provided that there is still sufficient mobility to allow the proper alignment of the foot, as observed in stage II lesions.22-26 The basic reasoning of this trend is to spare the joints and to preserve the mobility of the hindfoot, in addition to avoiding late triple arthrodesis complications, mainly secondary arthrosis in adjacent joints, especially in the ankle and in the remaining midtarsal joints.22,23 The replacement of the degenerated and insufficient posterior tibial tendon by the flexor digitorum tendon is the preferred option.22 Unfortunately, the recurrence of AAFD deformities after multiple tarsal osteotomies and the replacement of the posterior tibial tendon with the flexor digitorum longus is not rare. This recurrence is particularly reported in patients with rheumatic conditions, who are overweight, or are of an older age, and triple arthrodesis must be considered an alternative surgical treatment when these risk factors are present.22
Triple modeling arthrodesis is the standard surgical treatment for patients who do not respond to conservative AAFD treatment and who are already at a later stage of the disease, more specifically in stage III. Sometimes, it can also be indicated to a specific group of patients who have not yet developed rigid deformities accompanied by arthrosis (stage II), but who are older (> 65 years old) or obese (BMI > 30).8,12 Although numerous studies suggesting that obesity may have a negative impact on surgical outcomes in various joints,28-31 there are few studies on its effect on orthopedic foot and ankle surgeries. Recently, Soukup et al32 did not identify significant outcome differences when comparing with normal body weight, overweight and obese patients. According to these authors, the treatment of AAFD grade II through flexor digitorum tendon transfer and multiple osteotomies may also be indicated for patients with BMI > 25. However, the results of this study should be analyzed with caution because the average time of the postoperative follow-up was relatively short, of only 3 years.
Regarding the outcome of the surgical treatment of AAFD, it is worth noting that not all painful symptoms are completely eliminated by the procedure, either when it corrects deformities through multiple tarsal osteotomies or when the correction is accompanied by definitive tarsal stabilization through a triple arthrodesis.12 Residual pain is a common cause of some degree of patient dissatisfaction with the outcome of the surgical treatment, regardless of whether osteotomies or arthrodeses were performed.33,34 It is worth mentioning that despite observing bone consolidation in 95% of the operated feet from our case series, residual pain persisted in a medium intensity level, of ~ 3 points in the VAS. This finding reinforces the need to inform the patient in advance that the surgery will not necessarily lead to the complete elimination of painful discomfort, even if bone healing is complete after the arthrodesis. The persistence of residual pain may have reflected directly the degree of personal satisfaction of our patients regarding the final surgical outcome. Of the 20 feet operated on, complete satisfaction was reported in only 7 (35%), while satisfaction with minor or major restrictions was reported in 13 feet (65%).
A possible explanation for the persistence of pain can be the fact that the surgery was not able to adequately correct preexisting deformities. Since the postoperative clinical evaluation only considered half of the feet as completely corrected, the presence of residual deformities could be responsible for the persistence of pain. According to the radiographic evaluation, the mean percentage increase in the plantar arch height after the surgery was restricted to only ~ 34%; in addition, residual valgus persisted at an above average level, ~ 8º, even though the surgical treatment provided an average correction index of 27%. The only deformity that was substantially corrected in our case series was abduction, which virtually reached the average value within the normality range, that is, ~ 3º.
The retrospective nature of the present study and the small size of the sample group are the limitations of the present study. However, we believe that the information obtained may be useful to consider the limitations of triple modeling arthrodesis as a way to completely alleviate AAFD-related symptoms in a severe state. It is necessary to consider that this type of corrective surgery is not simple, and that its execution requires expert surgeons to achieve adequate foot positioning. The incomplete correction of severe deformities by the surgical treatment may be an important factor in the maintenance of residual pain, but its real importance is not yet fully known, and it cannot be identified in the present study.
CONCLUSION
Although triple modeling arthrodesis is indicated for the treatment of advanced AAFD, presenting a high bone consolidation index, the incomplete correction of preexisting deformities and the persistence of residual pain contributed to a high disappointment rate of the patients with the surgical results.
REFERENCES
