ABSTRACT:
OBJECTIVE This paper aims to evaluate patients with articular calcaneal fractures treated with
a minimally invasive surgical technique between January 2015 and August 2016, with
emphasis on radiographic results.
METHODS Retrospective study of 49 patients with 64 displaced calcaneal fractures treated with
open reduction by minimal lateral access to the subtalar joint and minimal fixation.
Pre- and postoperative radiographic studies were performed to measure the angles of
Böhler and Gissane.
RESULTS The average angle of Böhler before surgery was 2.5º, increasing to an average value
of 25.3º after the minimally invasive surgical treatment. The average angle of Gissane
before surgery was 136.3º, decreasing to an average value of 114.3º after the procedure.
CONCLUSION The minimally invasive surgical technique improves the radiographic parameters of
intra-articular calcaneal fractures, with appropriate anatomical restoration of anatomical
shape.
Keywords: calcaneus; minor surgical procedures; radiography.
RESUMO:
OBJETIVO Avaliar pacientes com fraturas intra-articulares de calcâneo tratados entre janeiro
de 2015 e agosto de 2016 com técnica cirúrgica minimamente invasiva, com ênfase no
resultado radiológico.
MÉTODOS Estudo retrospectivo de 49 pacientes com 64 fraturas intra-articulares de calcâneo,
submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico minimamente invasivo. As lesões foram tratadas com
redução aberta por acesso mínimo lateral à articulação subtalar e fixação mínima.
Foi realizado estudo radiográfico no pré- e no pós-operatório para aferição dos ângulos
de Böhler e de Gissane.
RESULTADOS O ângulo de Böhler médio dos casos antes da cirurgia foi de 2,5º, apresentando aumento
da média dos ângulos para 25,3º após o tratamento cirúrgico minimamente invasivo.
O ângulo de Gissane médio dos casos antes da cirurgia foi de 136,3º, apresentando
diminuição da média dos ângulos para 114,3º na análise após a cirurgia.
CONCLUSÃO A técnica cirúrgica minimamente invasiva permite melhora dos parâmetros radiográficos
(ângulos de Böhler e Gissane) nas fraturas intra-articulares de calcâneo, com sua
adequada recuperação da forma anatômica.
Palavras-chave: calcâneo; procedimentos cirúrgicos menores; radiografia.
FIGURES
| Citation: Félix GC, Matias MS, Lira RCA, Matias NS, Sousa CJD, Pinto Neto LH. Radiographic Analysis of Intra-articular Fractures of the Calcaneus in patients undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment in a Tertiary Hospital*. 55(2):226. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1700824 |
| Note: * Study performed at the Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Instituto Doutor José Frota, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. |
| Conflict of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interests to declare. |
| Received: April 16 2018; Accepted: December 18 2018 |
INTRODUCTION
Calcaneal fractures are the most common tarsal bones injuries,1,2 representing 2% of all fractures. They are displaced and intra-articular in 60 to 75% of the cases, in which surgical correction is indicated.3-5
Calcaneal fractures often result in disability and prolonged absence from work activities; in addition, they are more prevalent in the economically active population.3,4,6,7
Despite the introduction of modern surgical techniques, unsatisfactory results are common.8,9 Over the past 20 years, many authors have preferred the extended lateral access route and internal fixation with plate and screws.10,11 In such cases, up to 43.5% of the patients evolved with soft tissue complications, requiring secondary procedures for synthesis material removal.12 Other authors have published results from less invasive methods, with economical access routes and minimal fixation using wires and screws, and reported lower complication rates.8
The angles of Böhler and Gissane indicate changes in the joint facet and qualify fracture resolution3,5 (Figures 1 and 2).
This study aims to evaluate the radiographic profile of intra-articular calcaneal fractures by assessing radiographically the angles of Böhler and Gissane, before and after surgical treatment with a minimally invasive technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This is a descriptive, retrospective study including patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated at a referral trauma hospital in the state of Ceará, Brazil, from January 2015 to August 2016. During this period, 146 patients with calcaneal fracture were seen. Patients under 18 years-old, undergoing conservative treatment, or conventional therapy (‘L’ lateral access route and internal fixation with plate and screws), with incomplete medical records, lost to follow-up, or who died during follow-up were excluded from the study. Thus, 49 patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical treatment were selected for this series; since 15 subjects had bilateral calcaneal fractures, a total of 64 injuries were analyzed (N = 64).
Data were collected from medical records using a structured script including age, gender, and trauma mechanism. In addition, the angles of Böhler and Gissane were measured in pre- and postoperative radiographs with a standardized goniometer. Normal values were defined as 20 to 40º and 100 to 120º for the Böhler and Gissane angles, respectively.
Surgical Technique
The surgical procedure is performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia and positioned in lateral decubitus. Asepsis and antisepsis are performed, followed by sterile fields placement. Next, a minimal lateral surgical access to the subtalar joint, guided by a line between the inferior aspect of the lateral malleolus and the fourth toe, is made. Dissecting through anatomical planes, the subtalar joint is approached for open reduction of the fracture using levers or bone hooks. Then, an internal fixation with 3.5 mm/4.5 mm cannulated screws or percutaneous Kirschner wires is performed under radioscopy with image intensifier.
Data Analysis
Data were compiled and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Mean, median, and standard deviation values were calculated for continuous variables, and percentages were determined for categorical variables. A t-test for paired samples compared the angles of Böhler and Gissane. A confidence interval of 95% and a p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Ethical Issues
The study was duly authorized by the research Ethics committee under protocol No. 1.710.233 from September 2, 2016.
RESULTS
In total, 49 patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures were analyzed. Since there were 15 cases of bilateral fractures (30.61%), a total of 64 fractures were analyzed. Six of these (9.37%) were open fractures. There was a predominance of male patients (89.79%), with a 9:1 ratio to females (Figure 3). The mean age of the patients was 39 years (ranging from 18–70 years-old). Thirty-six (71,42%) patients reported falls as trauma mechanisms, with an average fall height of approximately 4.5 meters. In addition, 10 (20.4%) patients reported traffic accidents and 3 (6.12%) reported firearm injuries as trauma mechanisms (Figure 4). Sixteen (32.65%) of the 49 patients reported work-related accidents. The right foot was affected in 48% cases and the left foot was injured in 52% subjects.

All fractures were analyzed through lateral calcaneal radiographs for evaluating the angle of Böhler (whose normal reference value ranges from 20–40º) and the angle of Gissane (whose normal reference value ranges from 100–120º) measurements. The mean angle of Böhler before surgery was 2.5º (median, 0º), increasing to an average value of 25.3º (median, 24º) after minimally invasive surgical treatment (p < 0.001). The mean angle of Gissane before surgery was 136.3º (median, 140º), decreasing to an average value of 114.3º (median, 116º) in the postoperative period (p < 0.001) (Tables 1 and 2).
| Patient | Foot | Age | Gender | Trauma mechanism | Height (m) | Work-related accident | Fracture | Preoperative Böhler angle (degrees) | Postoperative Böhler angle (degrees) | Preoperative Gissane angle (degrees) | Postoperative Gissane angle (degrees) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R | 29 | m | Traffic accident | No | Closed | -10 | 26 | 120 | 120 | |
| 1* | L | Closed | 2 | 28 | 118 | 116 | |||||
| 2 | L | 35 | m | Fall | 6 | No | Closed | 22 | 24 | 146 | 140 |
| 2* | R | Closed | 10 | 20 | 140 | 129 | |||||
| 3 | L | 52 | m | Fall | 4 | No | Closed | -10 | 5 | 116 | 114 |
| 4 | R | 35 | m | Fall | 2.5 | No | Closed | -5 | 26 | 150 | 118 |
| 4* | L | Closed | 8 | 22 | 142 | 126 | |||||
| 5 | R | 16 | m | Fall | 5 | No | Closed | 10 | 46 | 146 | 116 |
| 5* | L | Closed | 20 | 35 | 138 | 122 | |||||
| 6 | R | 45 | m | Fall | 4 | No | Closed | 0 | 20 | 146 | 124 |
| 7 | R | 36 | m | Fall | 4 | Yes | Closed | 0 | 26 | 140 | 110 |
| 7* | L | Closed | 5 | 20 | 145 | 112 | |||||
| 8 | R | 40 | m | Fall | 3 | Yes | Closed | 0 | 18 | 144 | 100 |
| 9 | L | 26 | m | Fall | 16 | Yes | Closed | 0 | 22 | 152 | 124 |
| 10 | R | 55 | m | Fall | 3 | Yes | Closed | 0 | 20 | 140 | 112 |
| 11 | L | 65 | m | Fall | 4 | No | Closed | -12 | 22 | 140 | 108 |
| 11* | R | Closed | 4 | 30 | 138 | 118 | |||||
| 12 | L | 31 | m | Fall | 5 | Yes | Closed | 0 | 24 | 150 | 114 |
| 13 | L | 47 | m | Fall | 7 | Yes | Closed | 2 | 28 | 142 | 124 |
| 13* | R | Closed | 5 | 24 | 132 | 115 | |||||
| 14 | L | 54 | m | Fall | 2 | Yes | Closed | 12 | 20 | 56 | 110 |
| 15 | R | 19 | m | Fall | 14 | No | Closed | 0 | 22 | 146 | 122 |
| 15* | L | Closed | 10 | 29 | 132 | 115 | |||||
| 16 | R | 30 | m | Traffic accident | No | Open | 0 | 24 | 148 | 110 | |
| 17 | R | 40 | m | Fall | 3 | Yes | Closed | 10 | 28 | 128 | 106 |
| 18 | R | 35 | m | Fall | 3.5 | Yes | Closed | 12 | 38 | 140 | 135 |
| 18* | L | No | Closed | 14 | 54 | 138 | 115 | ||||
| 19 | R | 30 | m | Traffic accident | No | Closed | 0 | 24 | 100 | 110 | |
| 20 | R | 52 | m | Fall | 2 | No | Closed | 16 | 24 | 138 | 104 |
| 21 | R | 58 | m | Fall | 15 | Yes | Closed | 8 | 26 | 136 | 124 |
| 21* | L | Closed | 10 | 29 | 140 | 126 | |||||
| 22 | R | 35 | f | Traffic accident | No | Open | -6 | 20 | 128 | 114 | |
| 23 | R | 45 | m | Gunshot wound | No | Open | -12 | 2 | 120 | 118 | |
| 24 | L | 44 | m | Fall | 3 | No | Closed | -10 | 12 | 130 | 120 |
| 25 | R | 26 | m | Fall | 2 | Yes | Closed | 30 | 30 | 158 | 118 |
| 26 | R | 33 | m | Fall | 2 | Yes | Closed | -10 | 30 | 140 | 124 |
| 27 | L | 37 | m | Fall | 3 | Yes | Closed | -12 | 28 | 44 | 108 |
| 28 | L | 48 | f | Gunshot wound | No | Open | 6 | 20 | 128 | 114 | |
| 29 | L | 35 | m | Fall | 2 | Yes | Closed | -8 | 34 | 138 | 110 |
| 30 | R | 57 | m | Fall | 3 | No | Closed | 12 | 22 | 156 | 120 |
| 31 | L | 37 | m | Fall | 3 | No | Closed | 0 | 26 | 158 | 106 |
| 32 | L | 44 | m | Fall | 4 | Yes | Closed | -2 | 26 | 138 | 112 |
| 32* | R | Closed | 5 | 24 | 132 | 114 | |||||
| 33 | L | 37 | f | Traffic accident | No | Closed | 0 | 22 | 148 | 122 | |
| 34 | R | 13 | m | Fall | 3 | No | Closed | -2 | 20 | 156 | 130 |
| 35 | R | 34 | m | Fall | 4 | No | Closed | 4 | 22 | 148 | 116 |
| 36 | R | 32 | m | Traffic accident | No | Closed | 6 | 24 | 142 | 128 | |
| 36* | L | Closed | 14 | 30 | 124 | 108 | |||||
| 37 | L | 67 | m | Fall | 3 | No | Closed | 10 | 28 | 156 | 120 |
| 38 | R | 24 | m | Fall | 4 | No | Closed | 2 | 22 | 154 | 130 |
| 39 | L | 70 | m | Traffic accident | No | Closed | 12 | 22 | 130 | 118 | |
| 40 | R | 52 | m | Fall | 4 | No | Closed | 0 | 20 | 112 | 108 |
| 40* | L | Closed | -22 | 12 | 152 | 118 | |||||
| 41 | R | 59 | f | Fall | 3 | No | Closed | -8 | 32 | 170 | 116 |
| 42 | L | 49 | m | Fall | 3 | No | Closed | 14 | 38 | 146 | 108 |
| 43 | L | 58 | f | Fall | 4 | No | Closed | 6 | 14 | 152 | 122 |
| 44 | R | 26 | m | Fall | 4 | Yes | Closed | 6 | 30 | 140 | 108 |
| 44* | L | 0 | 26 | 148 | 112 | ||||||
| 45 | R | 16 | m | Gunshot wound | No | Open | 10 | 36 | 120 | 120 | |
| 46 | L | m | Traffic accident | No | Open | 4 | 30 | 110 | 118 | ||
| 47 | R | 26 | m | Traffic accident | No | Closed | -2 | 42 | 142 | 108 | |
| 48 | R | 29 | m | Traffic accident | No | Closed | 0 | 20 | 138 | 102 | |
| 49 | R | 29 | m | Fall | 4 | No | Closed | 0 | 24 | 140 | 102 |
| 49* | L | Closed | 4 | 22 | 138 | 112 |
Abbreviations: R, right; L, left; m, male, f, female.
* contralateral fracture at the same patient.

| Preoperative (standard deviation) | Postoperative (standard deviation) | p-value* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Böhler angle, average value | 2.5º (9.5) | 25.3º (8.6) | < 0.001 |
| Gissane angle, average value | 136.3º (21.3) | 114.3º (8.2) | < 0.001 |
* t-test.

DISCUSSION
Calcaneal joint fractures have significant morbidity, constituting severe injuries that often cause disabling and permanent sequelae. They usually affect young males in an economically active age group and may cause great socioeconomic impairment. In the studied sample, 89.79% of the patients were male, with a mean age of 39 years-old, reinforcing the statement that these injuries affect individuals in full exercise of their socioeconomic functions. In the literature, the most frequent causal agent reported was falls, which is consistent with our sample (71.42%).13
Although this is a widely studied fracture, there is still no consensus on its classification, treatment, and ideal surgical technique.14 The literature is scarce on high-level evidence studies on surgical techniques for calcaneal fractures. Many studies report several surgical techniques, but few compare them. In terms of functionality, according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) questionnaire, a minimally invasive percutaneous fixation technique using Kirschner wires has superior results and fewer complications when compared with more invasive techniques.15
Here, we report surgical outcome of 49 patients (64 injuries) with calcaneal joint fractures treated through a minimally invasive surgical method under the premise of possible functional recovery with no treatment complications, which should be deemed unacceptable.
The comparison of pre- and postoperative radiographies revealed an improvement in the angle of Böhler, from 2.5 to 25.3º (which is within the normal range, i.e., from 20–40º) and in the angle of Gissane, from 136.3 to 114.3º (which is also within the normal range, i.e., from 100–120º). The comparison between mean pre- and postoperative angles in this sample showed a high statistical significance, according to the t-test (p < 0.001), suggesting a positive association between good results regarding the angles of Böhler and Gissane and the use of minimally invasive surgical technique.
Calcaneal anatomical parameters recovery may be similar between the minimally invasive technique and the conventional technique, as shown by Yeo et al,16 who compared the postoperative radiographic results of the conventional technique with broad lateral approach (correction of the angles of Böhler and Gissane average values to 25.5º and 119.0º, respectively) with the minimally invasive technique by subtalar approach (correction of the angles of Böhler and Gissane to 26.5º and 115.5º, respectively). These authors also showed a lower rate of surgical wound complications when the minimally invasive technique was performed.
In a meta-analysis, Wang et al17 demonstrated that the conventional technique presented more postoperative complications compared to the minimally invasive technique but found no statistical difference when comparing the postoperative radiographic results of the angles of Böhler and Gissane.
Loucks e Buckley5 conducted a prospective randomized study to assess the angle of Böhler and its correlation with fracture treatment outcomes. They observed that surgical treatment improved the values and functional conditions of the angle. These results from the radiographic evaluation reflect the adequate recovery of the calcaneal anatomical shape with the surgical technique employed. Angle restoration is directly related to the quality of fragment reduction.
The improvement of these angles does not guarantee that the functional result will be successful, and this study does not intend to perform a functional evaluation.
A limitation of this study is the lack of calcaneal fractures grouping per severity. Some patients did not have adequate images for fracture classification in their medical records. This can make it difficult to understand which groups of fractures are most amenable to minimally invasive surgical treatment with good radiographic results.
CONCLUSION
In our sample, the minimally invasive surgical technique improved the angles of Böhler and Gissane in intra-articular calcaneal fractures, resulting in an adequate recovery of the anatomical shape.






