ABSTRACT:
Deep vein thrombosis in the upper extremities is uncommon, especially in the
pediatric population and in the trauma setting. The diagnosis is challenging,
due to its rarity, requiring a high degree of suspicion.
We describe a rare case of humeral vein thrombosis after a displaced
supracondylar fracture of the humerus in a 7-year-old girl. The risk factors for
thromboembolism and sequelae are also discussed.
The early detection and treatment are mandatory to prevent poor outcomes, such as
fatal thromboembolism.
Keywords: deep vein thrombosis; humeral fractures; thrombosis; venous thromboembolism; child.
RESUMO:
Trombose venosa profunda nas extremidades superiores é incomum, especialmente na
população pediátrica e no ambiente do trauma. O diagnóstico é desafiador, devido
a sua raridade, exigindo alto grau de suspeita.
Descrevemos um caso raro de trombose venosa úmera após uma fratura supracondilar
deslocada do úmero em uma menina de 7 anos. Os fatores de risco para
tromboem-bolismo e sequelas também são discutidos.
A detecção e o tratamento precoces são obrigatórios para evitar desfechos ruins,
como tromboembolismo fatal.
Palavras-chave: trombose venosa profunda; fraturas do úmero; trombose; tromboembolia venosa; criança.
FIGURES
| Citation: Ferrão AM, Fernandes P, Wircker P, Catarino J, Arcângelo J, Ovídio J. Deep Vein Thrombosis after a Supracondylar Fracture of the Humerus in a Child - A Rare Complication*. 58(4):e672. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1722580 |
| Financial Support: The authors declare that they have received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of the present article. |
| Note: Ethics Statement The present study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. |
|
Conflict of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interests to declare. |
| *Work developed at the Orthopedics and Traumatology Service at Centro Hospitalar Universitário of Lisboa Central, Portugal. |
| Received: June 02 2020; Accepted: September 16 2020 |
INTRODUCTION
Humeral supracondylar fractures represent one third of all pediatric limb fractures inchildren under 7 years old, and are a cause of significant morbidity in the pediatric population.1,2
The complications most frequently encountered in this setting include neurovascular injuries, compartment syndrome, malunion, and functional impairment.1,2
Nerve and vascular injuries can be iatrogenic, or they may occur after a traumatic event. Vascular compromise can be caused by vessel rupture, kinking, compression, spasm, or intimal lesion, and the incidence increases according to the degree of fracture dislocation.3
The overall incidence of vascular complications associated with supracondylar fractures ranges from 3,2 to 14,3%, but may be as high as 20% in Gartland type III fractures.3,4 Upon inspection, ecchymosis in the antecubital fossa with skin and brachialis tethering are warning signs of neuro-vascular damage.4 Although the incidence and management of arterial injuries in supracondylar fractures is well established in the literature, little has been said about vein compromise.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children is rare, ranging from 0.01% to 0.2% of pediatric hospitalizations; higher rates are observed in specific groups, including those with central venous catheters (CVC), malignancies, obesity and those submitted to major surgeries.5,6
In pediatric trauma patients, the risk of developing VTE is uncertain. The severity of the injury, increasing age, anemia, external fixation, obesity, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, spinal cord injury and the presence of a CVC are well known risk factors in this population.6–8 Some anatomical locations are also more prone to thrombotic events, that is, trauma tothe head, the spine or major vessels, as well as pelvic and lower limb fractures.8
We report a case of humeral vein thrombosis after a supracondylar fracture in a child, given its rarity and difficult diagnosis, considering its potential complications.
CASE REPORT
A 7-year-old girl was transferred to our emergency department after a fallwith an outstretched arm which resulted in a supracondylar fracture of the left humerus, Gartland type III
(►Fig. 1). She had been previously immobilized with a posterior splint at an outside hospital.
Upon presentation, she complained of pain and had a cold and reddish forearm, with a peripheral oxygen saturation of 89% to 90% and weak palpable radial and ulnar pulses(►Fig.2).
After splint removal, the pain subsided, shehad aweak radial pulse, normal capillary refill, and the hand oximetry reached 98%. On an emergency basis, the patient underwent a smooth manipulation with closed reduction and pinning with 2 divergent lateral Kirschner wires and immobilization in a posterior splint at 120° of flexion (►Fig. 3). Six hours postoperatively, the child had a pain-free and warm upper extremity, a peripheral oxygen saturation of 100%, and palpable distal pulses.
At 48 hours following surgery, there was persistent pain and progressive tender edema with skin blistering (►Fig. 4). The peripheral pulses were normal, and there was no pain exacerbation, with passive mobilization of the fingers. After excluding compartment syndrome, a venous duplex ultrasonography was performed, which revealed deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the humeral vein.
Treatment with 20 mg of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin was initiated and maintained for 3 months. One week after surgery, the child was pain-free, with edema improvement, and was discharged from the hospital. At 3 months of follow-up, the fracture had healed healed, and the elbow had full range of motion (0° to 120°), without additional skin or vascular complications (►Figs. 5 and 6). There were no embolic events. The studies conducted were negative for thrombophilia.
DISCUSSION
The management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus can be demanding. Early complications include damage to neurovascular or muscular structures and compartment syndrome.9 Neurological injuries, most frequently in the form of neuropraxia,are common(~20%),affectingmostlythemedian nerve and its anterior interosseous branch.3,9 The most disastrous injuries are vascular, for, when left untreated, they can lead to neurologic deficits, muscle stiffness or Volkmann ischemic contractures.9 Hardware-related complications and malunion sequelae are usually later events.9
According to the literature, pediatric trauma patients have a prevalence of VTE of 0.3 to 0.8 for every 1,000 trauma discharges.7 In addition, emergent or urgent surgeries are more likely to result in VTE than elective procedures.6
For the diagnosis, clinical suspicion is needed and a detailed vascular examination is crucial, with assessment of pulses, temperature of the limb, capillary return and pulse oximetry.3 The use of intraoperative or postoperative ultrasound is also helpful to assess the patency of the vessels.4 In some cases, pulse oximetry waveform can be used to determine the need for vascular exploration.10
The sequelae of VTE, namely postthrombotic syndrome, death, and the risk of recurrence have not been fully investigated in children.5 The morbidity of DVT depends on the location and and severity of the injury, inducing mainly pain and swelling when in the extremities.5
In children, VTE is associated with increased mortality, particularly among the younger patients, and it varies from 1% to 8%.5,6 Guzman et al.7 searched for an association between VTE and mortality in children, and they concluded that patients with upper-limb fractures and VTE had the highest overall mortality rate (6.4%). This increased mortality is thought to be due to a delay in diagnosis and treatment (owing to a lower index of suspicion) and/or because of the anatomical proximity of the upper-extremity veins to the right-sided chambers of the heart.7
Therationaletoidentify thegroupsatriskofdevelopingVTE among children is to prevent death secondary to pulmonary embolism.7 Currently, there is no consensus for thrombopro-phylaxis inthe pediatric field, nor risk-stratification forVTE.5,6
Given the rare incidence of VTE in this age group, delays in diagnosis are frequent. In the case herein reported, the edema, skin coloration and blistering were crucial to raise suspicion. So far, there are many studies focusing on arterial and nervous complications, but none about venous thromboembolism in this setting.
The aim of the present case report is to raise attention to a rare vascular complication of a humeral supracondylar fracture. To our knowledge, the present is the first report of this complication.
All orthopedic surgeons must be aware of the existence of upper-extremity DVT to make an early diagnosis.
We, therefore, recommend a detailed neurovascular examination before and after surgery, and, if the clinical suspicion is high, an evaluation with Doppler sonography.
