ABSTRACT:
Ankle osteoarthritis (AOA) is associated with pain and variable functional
limitation, demanding clinical treatment and possible surgical indication when
conservative measures are ineffective – arthrodesis has been the procedure of
choice, because it reduces pain, restores joint alignment and makes the segment
stable, preserving gait. The present study reports 3 cases (3 ankles) of male
patients between 49 and 63 years old, with secondary AOA, preoperative American
Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS AHS) of 27 to 39
points, treated by minimally invasive tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using
blocked retrograde intramedullary nail. Hospital stay was of 1 day, and the
patients were authorized for immediate loading with removable ambulation
orthotics, as tolerated. The physical therapy treatment, introduced since
hospitalization, was maintained, prioritizing gait training, strength gain, and
proprioception. Clinical and radiographic follow-up was performed at weeks 1, 2,
6, 12 and 24. After evidence of consolidation (between the 6th and
10th weeks), the orthotics were removed. One patient complained
of pain in the immediate postoperative period and, at the end of the
1st year, only one patient presented pain during rehabilitation,
which was completely resolved with analgesics. Currently, the patients do not
present complaints, returning to activities without restrictions – one of them,
to the practice of soccer and rappelling. The postoperative AOFAS AHS was from
68 to 86 points.
Keywords: ankle joint; arthrodesis; osteoarthritis; minimally invasive surgical procedures; surgical procedures, operative; ankle.
RESUMO:
A osteoartrite do tornozelo (OAT) está associada a quadro álgico e limitação
funcional variável, demandando tratamento clínico e eventual indicação cirúrgica
quando as medidas conservadoras são inefetivas – a artrodese tem sido o
procedimento de escolha, por reduzir a dor, restaurar o alinhamento articular e
tornar o segmento estável, preservando a marcha. O presente estudo relata 3
casos (3 tornozelos) de pacientes do sexo masculino, com entre 49 e 63 anos de
idade, portadores de OAT secundária, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society
Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS AHS, na sigla em inglês) pré-operatória de 27 a 39
pontos, tratados mediante artrodese tibiotalocalcaneana minimamente invasiva
utilizando haste intramedular retrógrada bloqueada. A permanência hospitalar foi
de 1 dia, e os pacientes foram autorizados para carga imediata com órteses
removíveis para deambulação, conforme tolerado. O tratamento fisioterápico,
introduzido desde o internamento, foi mantido, priorizando-se treino de marcha,
ganho de força e propriocepção. Foi realizado acompanhamento clínico e
radiográfico nas semanas 1, 2, 6, 12 e 24. Após evidências de consolidação
(entre a 6ª e a 10ª semanas), as órteses foram retiradas. Um paciente queixou-se
de dor no pós-operatório imediato e, ao final do 1° ano, apenas 1 paciente
apresentou dor durante a reabilitação, resolvida completamente com analgésicos.
Atualmente, os pacientes não apresentam queixas, retornando às atividades sem
restrições – um deles, à prática de futebol e rapel. A AOFAS AHS pós-operatória
foi de 68 a 86 pontos.
Palavras-chave: articulação do tornozelo; artrodese; osteoartrite; procedimentos cirúrgicos minimamente invasivos; procedimentos cirúrgicos operatórios; tornozelo.
FIGURES
| Citation: Moreira FD, Jambeiro JES, Cordeiro Neto AT, Oliveira JA, Leão FF, Guedes A. Minimally Invasive Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis with Blocked Retrograde Intramedullary Nail - Report of Three Cases*. 59(1):e143. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1731356 |
| Financial Support: There was no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources. |
| Note: * Work developed in the Groups of Foot and Ankle Surgery and Orthopedic Oncology, Hospital Santa Izabel, Santa Casa de Misericórdia da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil. |
|
Conflict of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interests to declare. |
| Received: September 22 2020; Accepted: January 15 2021 |
INTRODUCTION
Primary ankle osteoarthritis (AOA) is rare, and its secondary form1 is common for traumatic injuries, Charcot, rheumatoid arthritis, and avascular necrosis.2,3
There are numerous treatment options for AOA, from clinical to surgical management, when conservative measures have no effect – the main options for open treatment include arthrodesis and replacement and distraction arthroplasties.4
Arthrodesis has been the procedure of choice for reducing pain, restoring alignment and stabilizing the segment, preserving gait.
Ankle arthrodesis can be performed using different types of implants and different access routes, using or not grafts or bone substitutes.2,3,4
Minimally invasive tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) by means of blocked retrograde intramedullary nail (BRIMN) has been indicated due to its biomechanical (shared load, greater bending stiffness, dynamic compression, and rotational stability) and biological (large bone contact area, minimally invasive procedure, articular opening that produces osteocartilaginous "syrup" with hematopoietic potential) advantages.3,5
The aim of the present study is to report the cases of three patients with secondary AOA (three ankles) submitted to minimally invasive TTCA, using BRIMN.
DESCRIPTION OF CASES
Three patients (three ankles) with secondary AOA, attended at our institution, were treated by minimally invasive TTCA using BRIMN, after failures in conservative measures (cases 1 and 2) and arthrodesis failure (case 3) (►Fig. 1), in 2017.

All patients were male, aged between 49 and 63 years old, with variable functional pain and limitation. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS AHS)6 was between 27 and 39 points (►Table 1).
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Patient 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | Male | Male |
| Age (years old) | 49 | 61 | 63 |
| Main complaint | Pain | Pain | Pain |
| Side | Left | Left | Right |
| Arc of motion | 5th | 25th | 10th |
| Deformity | Valgus | Neutral | Valgus |
| Diagnosis | Sequela of tibial pylon fracture | Chronic ankle instability | Failure in tibiotalar arthrodesis |
| Load start (weeks) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Consolidation time (weeks) | 10 | 6 | 8 |
| Preoperative AOFAS | 39 | 33 | 27 |
| Postoperative AOFAS | 68 | 72 | 86 |
| Early complication | No | Pain, resolved with painkillers | No |
| Late complication | No | No | Pain, resolved with painkillers |
Abbreviation: AOFAS, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale

The patients were positioned in supine position in a radiotransparent surgical table, under sedation, blockade and antibiotic prophylaxis, without ischemia or traction. The joints were accessed by three portals, one subtalar and two tibiotalars (anterolateral and anteromedial), previously marked under fluoroscopy with a disposable 40 × 12mm needle. Incisions of 1.0 to 1.5 cm were made in the markings and dissection blunt to the joint capsules was performed, expanding the work area (►Fig. 2). A 4.3 mm motorized conical cutter was introduced for joint opening, complemented with curettes and osteotomes, exposing the subcondral bone. Joint preparation was completed by perforations with a 2.0 mm K-wire in the talar dome and tibial joint surface (►Fig. 2). It was fixed with BRIMN, in the traditional way. Skin sutures and compressive dressing were made. All procedures evolved without issues.

The patients were discharged on the 1st postoperative (PO) day. Immediate load initiated, as tolerated, using removable orthotics for ambulation. The stitches were removed on the 15th PO day.
Physical therapy treatment was introduced during hospitalization and continued in outpatient care, prioritizing gait training, strength gain, and proprioception.
Clinical and radiographic follow-ups (►Fig. 3) were performed at weeks 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24. After evidence of consolidation, between the 6th and 10th weeks, the orthotics were removed (►Fig. 4).

One patient complained of pain in the immediate PO, which was resolved with analgesics. At the end of the 1st year, only 1 patient presented with pain during rehabilitation, which was completely resolved with analgesics. Currently (3rd PO year), the patients do not present complaints.
All patients returned to activities without restrictions – one of them, to sports (soccer and rappelling). The postoperative AOFAS AHS6 was between 68 and 86 points (►Table 1).
DISCUSSION
Open TTCA is well-established in the treatment of AOA, regardless of the cause. It is an excellent alternative in the treatment of patients with poor preoperative conditions (low bone stock, misalignment of the hindfoot or history of multiple procedures).
However, despite providing ample exposure, it demands a longer hospital stay and is subject to complications such as infection, dehiscence, and pseudarthrosis, enhanced by comorbidities, often present in patients undergoing this procedure.3
In a study with 20 patients submitted to open TTCA with BRIMN by AOA, Charcot and deformities, consolidation was observed in 80% of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints and in 20% of the tibiocalcaneans. The AOFAS AHS progressed from 54.20 ±15.71 to 76.0 ±11.63 (p < 0.001 ). The average hospital stay was 6.7 days. There was a high rate of complications, especially infections (35%), culminating in an amputation below the knee.7
Rammelt et al.8 evaluated open TTCA with BRIMN in 38 patients, by nonunion, AOA, deformity, Charcot and postarthroplasty failure. They described adequate alignment in 92% and fusion in 84% of the patients. The average stay was 8.4 days. They identified a risk of 24% of at least one postoperative complication, nonunion being the most common, followed by problems with implants and infection.
In a retrospective study,9 29 patients with deformity underwent open TTCA with BRIMN, obtaining joint consolidation in 96.6%. There was an average increase in the AOFAS AHS from 29.7 to 74.3 (p < 0.01 ). As complications, three cases of tibial stress, three cases of neuropraxia, and three of infection.
Given the potential for complications, some authors advocate minimally invasive approaches, including percutaneous TTCA through BRIMN.3,5
Biz et al.5 presented 28 patients treated with TTCA by percutaneous BRIMN, most of them by post-traumatic AOA. They observed 100% consolidation and 92.85% of plantigrade and stable alignment. As complications, there were one case of screw Protrusion and one case of consolidation retardation, with associated pain.
A systematic review with meta-analysis2 included 8 patients treated by open TTCA and 15 by the arthroscopic approach. Three patients submitted to open TTCA and four to the arthroscopic approach had plantar ulcers. The fusion rates were similar (75 versus 67%; p=0.679). Complications occurred in 63% of open TTCAs (80% infections) and in 33%of the arthroscopicTTCA(100%nonunion).Thepresenceofulcersdid not influence the genesis of open TTCA infection (67 versus 60%); however, there was a significant increase in nonunion in arthroscopic TTCA (75versus18%; p=0.039).Patients without ulcer had a union rate of 80% for both methodologies.
We presented three cases of AOA treated by percutaneous TTCA with BRIMN. The length of stay (1 day) was considerably shorter than that of the literature for an open approach (between 3 and 8 days). The consolidation time (between 6 and 10 weeks) was lower than that of open procedures (12 weeks). The preoperative AOFAS AHS6 evolved from between 27 and 39 to between 68 and 86, a finding corroborated by the literature for TTCA with BRIMN,2,3,5,7,8,9,10 only observing early pain (1 patient) and late pain (1 patient), which were resolved after 1 year, without other complications so far.




