ABSTRACT:
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most effective operations to relieve pain
and improve function in the end stage of osteoarthritis (when bone on bone contact
occurs). The intraoperative complications of TKA include fracture, tendon or ligament
injury, and nerve or vascular complications. We herein describe an unusual complication
of intramedullary pin migration within the femoral canal during TKA. A 72-year-old
male patient underwent TKA with a posterior stabilization system with sacrifice of
the posterior cruciate ligament. The distal femur was sectioned and balance was checked
in extension. Then to make anterior, posterior, chamfer and notch cuts, the five-in-one
anteroposterior (AP) cutting block was placed on the distal femur and the cuts were
initiated. As there was a medial overhang of the cutting block, it was shifted laterally.
While doing so, the pins had to be shifted too, and one of them was inadvertently
hammered into the previously-created medullary canal opening of the femur. As usual
orthopedic instruments, like the long straight artery forceps and pituitary rongeurs,
failed to remove the migrated pin, an extralong laparoscopic grasper was used under
fluoroscopy control to locate, grasp, and remove the migrated pin.
Keywords: bone plates; bone screws; bone wires; finger phalanges; fractures, bone; fracture fixation internal.
RESUMO:
A artroplastia total do joelho (ATJ) é uma das cirurgias mais eficazes para alívio
da dor e melhora da função no estágio final da artrose (quando ocorre contato entre
os ossos). As várias complicações intraoperatórias da ATJ incluem fratura, lesão em
tendão ou ligamentos, e complicações nervosas ou vasculares. Neste artigo, descrevemos
uma complicação incomum: a migração do pino intramedular dentro do canal femoral durante
a ATJ. Um paciente do sexo masculino de 72 anos foi submetido a ATJ com sistema de
estabilização posterior e sacrifício do ligamento cruzado posterior. A porção distal
do fêmur foi seccionada, e o equilíbrio foi verificado em extensão. Em seguida, um
bloco anteroposterior (AP) cinco em um foi utilizado para seção anterior, posterior,
de chanfro, e entalhe. Por apresentar uma saliência medial, o bloco foi deslocado
em sentido lateral. Ao fazê-lo, os pinos também tiveram de ser deslocados, e um deles
foi inadvertidamente inserido na abertura do canal medular do fêmur criado. Como instrumentos
ortopédicos usuais, como pinça reta longa e saca-bocado pituitário não conseguiram
remover o pino migrado, uma pinça laparoscópica extralonga foi usada sob controle
fluoroscópico para localizar, agarrar e remover o pino migrado.
Palavras-chave: artroplastia do joelho; complicações intraoperatórias; pinos ortopédicos; procedimentos ortopédicos.
FIGURES
| Citation: Londhe SB, Shah RV, Banka P. An Unusual Complication of Intramedullary Pin Migration during Total Knee Arthroplasty – A Case Report. 59(Suppl S1):e39. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1739173 |
| Financial Support: The authors have no funding source to declare. |
| Note: Informed Consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. |
|
Conflict of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interests to declare. |
|
Work carried out at Hoy Spirit Hospital, Andheri, Mumbai, India. |
| Received: June 22 2021; Accepted: August 13 2021 |
INTRODUCTION
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most successful operations in orthopedics; it is highly effective in relieving pain and improving function.1 The occurrence of complications during TKA impacts the postoperative outcome and the functional improvement of the patient. Pinaroli et al.2 have described various intraoperative complications, which are mainly due to the surgical technique chosen, and they include periprostheticfractures,3 tendonorligament injury,4 and nerve5 or vascular6 complications. In the present article, we report a case of an unusual complication: pin migration into the femoral medullary canal during TKA. To the best of our knowledge, this complication has not been reported before.
CASE REPORT
The patient was a 72-year-old male who complained of pain and difficulty in walking and climbing stairs for the previous 6 months. The pain increased considerably when squatting and sitting on low seats, and was relieved only partially with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the local application of ice. Upon examination, the patient had a fixed flexion deformity of 15° with further flexion of 125° associated with crepitus and terminal movements, causing severe pain. Radiographs of the affected knee confirmed the clinical findings and showed advanced tricompartmental involvement, necessitating TKA. The patient was submitted toTKAunder spinal anesthesiawith theuse ofatourniquet. A midline skin incision was performed with a medial para-patellar approach, and the joint was exposed, which reconfirmed the advanced tricompartmental involvement. A posterior stabilized knee system was used sacrificing the posterior cruciate ligament. The tibia was prepared first, followed by the femur. After the distal portion of the femur was cut and the gap was checked in extension, a five-in-one anteroposterior (AP) cutting block was placed and cuts were initiated. However, a medial overhang of the cutting block was noted, hence it was shifted laterally to prevent uneven condylar cuts. While doing so, the pins had to be shifted too, and one of them was inadvertently hammered into the previously-created medullary canal opening of the femur. Therefore, an attempt was made to retrieve the pin with the help of an artery forceps, which was in vain, as it resulted in the pin getting pushed further into the medullary canal. Then, pituitary rongeurs were used to circumvent the depth issue; this maneuver also failed, as we could not reach deep enough to hold on to the tip of the pin (►Figs. 1 2). With no success in sight, C-arm fluoroscopy was employed to visualize the exact position of the pin, which was far beyond the reach of the usual “grabbing” instruments. An attempt was made to even “drop” the leg down, using gravity in the hope that the pin would “fall down” the medullary canal. During this event, one of the operating team members suggested the use of a laparoscopic instrument to remove the pin.
Fortunately, our operation theatre complex is well equipped with general and laparoscopic instruments. An extra-long laparoscopic grasper was used under fluoroscopy control to locate, grasp, and remove the migrated pin (►Figs. 3, 4 5). Once the migrated pin was removed, the TKA procedure was performed in the usual manner. Postoperatively, the patient was informed about this intra-operative event. The postoperative course in the hospitalwas uneventful, and the patient made a very good functional recovery after the TKA.
DISCUSSION
Intraoperative complications can occur during TKA procedure. Pinaroli et al.2 analyzed the intraoperative complications of 1,624 patients submitted to TKA, which included 69 fractures and ligament tears (3.8%), 40 fractures around the knee (2.2%), and 28 tendons or ligament tears (1.6%). In the study by Agarwala et al.,7 out of 3,168 primary TKAs performed between 2010 and 2017, 19 patients developed intraoperative fracture, 15 in the tibia and 4 in the femur, and most fractures occurred during cementing and final implantation (8 cases), followed by exposure and bone preparation (6 cases), and trialing (4 cases). One fracture occurred at an unknown time during the surgery. In the literature, there are many reports of pin-related complications with the use of computer-assisted navigation.8, 9 Beldame et al.,8 in a series of 385 TKAs, found an incidence of 1.3% (5 patients) of femoral fractures at the site of the tracker pin. Kamara et al.9 reported a complication rate of 0.16% (n=5) per pin site in atotal of 3,136 pin sites in 839 patients. To the best of our knowledge, the present case report is the first in the literature which describes this unusual complication of pin migration to the femoral medullary canal. The operating surgeon needs to be very careful in placing the five-in-one femoral cutting block, so as to ensure that the block isplaced in itsdesignated placebefore initiating the cuts. Also, while pinning the five-in-one cutting block to thebone, the surgeon needs tobeawareof the positionof the open femoral medullarycanal to prevent this avoidable error of migration of the pin.
