ABSTRACT:
OBJECTIVE Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is still a major challenge after major orthopaedic surgery,
including total knee replacement (TKR). The aim of this study was to estimate the
risk of VTE with aspirin-only pharmacologic prophylaxis following primary TKR surgery
versus direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC).
METHODS The study included 476 patients who underwent primary TKR from 2016 to 2020. All patients
received thromboprophylaxis with DOAC (DOAC group) (n=267) or aspirin (aspirin group)
(n = 209). Clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared between those who received
DOAC and aspirin. The primary outcome was the incidence of VTE. The secondary outcome
was wound complications.
RESULT Aspirin and DOAC were comparable in preventing VTE in patients who underwent primary
TKR. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was similar in the aspirin (10%) and factor
Xa inhibitor groups (10.1%), (p = 0.98) with zero case of pulmonary emboli in both groups. There was no significant
difference between the aspirin (1.4%) and DOAC groups (1.5%) regarding wound complication
(p = 0.95).
CONCLUSION Postoperative thromboprophylaxis with aspirin only was not associated with a higher
risk of postoperative VTE compared with DOAC following TKR. Considering the wide availability
and cost-effectiveness, aspirin may serve as a promising alternative to DOAC for VTE
prophylaxis.
Keywords: anticoagulants; arthroplasty, replacement, knee; venous thromboembolism.
RESUMO:
OBJETIVO O tromboembolismo venoso (TEV) ainda é um grande desafio após grandes cirurgias ortopédicas,
incluindo a artroplastia total do joelho (ATJ). O objetivo deste estudo foi estimar
o risco de TEV com profilaxia farmacológica apenas com ácido acetilsalicílico ou anticoagulante
oral direto (AOD) após a cirurgia primária de ATJ.
MÉTODOS O estudo incluiu 476 pacientes submetidos a ATJ primária de 2016 a 2020. Todos os
pacientes receberam tromboprofilaxia com AOD (grupo AOD) (n=267) ou ácido acetilsalicílico
(AAS) (grupo AAS) (n = 209). Os desfechos clínicos foram avaliados e comparados entre
aqueles que receberam AOD e AAS. O desfecho primário foi a incidência de TEV. O desfecho
secundário foi a ocorrência de complicações da ferida.
RESULTADO O AAS e o AOD foram comparáveis na prevenção de TEV em pacientes submetidos a ATJ
primária. A incidência de trombose venosa profunda foi semelhante nos grupos AAS (10%)
e AOD (10,1%, p = 0,98), sem nenhum caso de embolia pulmonar em ambos os grupos. Não houve diferença
significativa entre os grupos AAS (1,4%) e AOD (1,5%) em relação às complicações da
ferida (p = 0,95).
CONCLUSÃO A tromboprofilaxia pós-operatória apenas com AAS não foiassociada a um maior risco
de TEV pós-operatório em comparação à AOD após ATJ. Considerando a ampla disponibilidade
e custo-benefício, o AAS pode ser uma alternativa promissora ao AOD para a profilaxia
de TEV.
Palavras-chave: anticoagulantes; artroplastia do joelho; tromboembolia venosa.
FIGURES
| Citation: Sumargono E, Anastasia M, Singjie LC, Saleh I, Anestessia IJ, Kholinne E. The Comparison of Aspirin and Direct Oral Anticoagulant as Thromboprophylaxis Following Total Knee Replacement: A Retrospective Study. 59(6):e883. doi:10.1055/s-0044-1785510 |
| Financial Support The authors declare that this research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. |
|
Conflict of Interests The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper. |
|
Work carried out the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Carolus Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. |
| Received: March 04 2023; Accepted: July 21 2023 |
INTRODUCTION
Total knee replacement (TKR) has been one of the most successful orthopaedic interventions which have an impact on improving the quality of life. Projection studies suggest that the demand for primary TKR will steadily increase in the years to come.1 However, the TKR procedure also has some postoperative complications. One of the most common yet serious complications is venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Venous thromboembolism is a known complication after major orthopaedic surgery, including knee or hip replacement.2,3
Several studies have examined the efficacy of several antithrombotic drugs over their years as well as their side effects profiles, including prolonged wound leakage, bleeding, and infection.4,5 The following agents that are usually used for thromboprophylaxis are antiplatelet (aspirin) or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), such as factor Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban or edoxaban). However, it is currently recognized that aspirin is preferable over other anticoagulants because of its low risk of inducing major bleeding.6,7 Aspirin may serve as an alternative thromboprophylaxis agent following primary knee or hip replacement, particularly in patients at high risk of bleeding. Other advantages of aspirin over DOACs include its ease of administration, lack of monitoring needs, and low cost.8
Indonesia is one of the lower-middle income countries according to the World Bank.9 Therefore, there is a need to find the most effective and safe thromboprophylaxis with the most reasonable cost. The current study aims to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of aspirin compared with DOAC for VTE prophylaxis after TKR in a single institution. We hypothesized that there was no significant difference between aspirin and DOAC in preventing VTE after TKR procedure.
METHODS
Data Source and Study Cohort
This Institutional Review Board (IRB) of our institution approved the present study under the number (Number 940/RSSC-5B/AL/IX/DIRUT/2022). Retrospective data of 476 primary TKRs was extracted from the 5 years (2016–2020) of annual reports of TKR registry data in our institution. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients who underwent primary TKR surgery; and (2) patients who received aspirin or DOAC for VTE prophylaxis. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Prior hemorrhagic disease; (2) history of hypercoagulation state; (3) history of malignancy; (4) history of venous insufficiency; (5) bilateral TKR; (6) non-metal back tibial component. The sample selection of the study is shown in ►Fig. 1.
The primary outcome was postoperative symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurring during the index hospitalization, or responsible for readmission within 30 days, or an outpatient visit within 90 days after discharge, because an increased thromboembolic risk persists up to 3 months postoperatively. The secondary outcome was wound complication. All patients underwent the same surgical technique (medial parapatellar approach and application of a tourniquet 150 mmHg above diastolic blood pressure) and perioperative protocol (perioperative pain medication, 2 g of intravenous cefazoline as prophylactic antibiotics. The mechanical prophylaxis was periodic ankle pumping, started 6 hours postoperatively, along with the application of an intermittent pneumatic compression device (IPCD). All patients received chemical thromboprophylaxis, which were aspirin 160 mg aspirin group) or factor Xa inhibitors (DOAC group), which was either rivaroxaban 10 mg (Xarelto; Bayer Pharmaceutical, Leverkusen, Germany) or edoxaban 30 mg (Lixiana; Kalbe Farma, Jakarta, Indonesia) 12 hours following surgery and continued for 14 days. All of the implants used in this study were PFC Sigma or Attune (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA). Investigations for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were initiated on symptomatic patients in the routine follow-up examination. The diagnosis of VTE was made by confirming thrombosis of the deep vein involving the popliteal vein or more proximal leg veins (including the femoral, common femoral, and iliac veins) with a sonogram by a radiologist. Wound complicationwas defined as patients requiring irrigation and debridement, with or without component exchange. All data were collected from medical records by two medical doctors posted in the orthopedic service who were not involved in the surgery.
Statistical Analysis
All of the experimental data were statistically analyzed using SPSS Statistics for Windows version 26.0 software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Bivariate analysis was used to test the association between individual thromboprophylaxis and the major clinical outcomes of postoperative VTE using the Chisquared test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULT
The demographic data in ►Table 1 showed that there were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. The gender majority in both groups was female (80% versus 81%). More than ⅔ of the patients in both groups had comorbidities. Both groups showed similar comorbidities profiles, with hypertension being the most common comorbidity (45,4% and 51,3% in the aspirin and the DOAC groups, respectively). The length of stay in the aspirin and DOAC groups was equivalent (4.4 versus 4.6 days).
| Characteristic |
Aspirin group N=209 (45%) |
DOAC group N=267 (55%) |
P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age (years) | 68.3 | 67.9 | 0.32 |
| Gender: male/female (%) | 43/166 (20/80) | 53/214 (19/81) | 0.06 |
| Comorbidities | 0.94 | ||
| Hypertension (%) | 95 (45,4) | 137 (51,3) | |
| Diabetes mellitus type 2 (%) | 32 (15,3) | 39 (14,6) | |
| Cardiovascular disease (%) | 29 (13,8) | 28 (10,4) | |
| Kidney disease (%) | 7 (3,3) | 2 (0,7) | |
| Cerebrovascular disease (%) | 3 (1,4) | 3 (1,1) | |
| Liver disease (%) | 3 (1,4) | 3 (1,1) | |
| Mean length of stay (SD) | 4.4 (2.7) | 4.6 (2.1) | 0.09 |
Abbreviation: DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant.
There were 21 DVT cases (10%) in the aspirin group compared with 27 cases (10.1%) in those in DOAC group (p = 0.98). For wound complications, there were 3 cases in the aspirin group (1.4%) and 4 cases in the DOAC group (1.5%); (p = 0.95). Only 2 cases required component exchanges because of prosthetic joint infection, 1 from each group. The rest were treated with irrigation and debridement. ►Fig. 2 showed that there was a similar number of DVT incidence and wound complications after TKR between the aspirin and DOAC groups.
DISCUSSION
From our study, we found that aspirin and the DOAC (rivaroxaban or edoxaban) were comparable in preventing VTE in patients who underwent TKR. The incidence of DVT was similar in the aspirin and factor Xa inhibitor groups (10% versus10.1%, respectively), with no occurrence of pulmonary emboli (PE) in either group. There was no association between the type of VTE prophylaxis agent with the risk of wound complication in post-TKR patients because the incidence in the aspirin and factor Xa inhibitor groups (1.4% versus 1.5%, respectively) was also similar.
The exact incidence of DVT and pulmonary emboli remains controversial.10 Without any prophylaxis protocol, incidence rates greater than 50% following joint replacement have been reported.11 The incidence has dramatically decreased nowadays, with early mobilization, mechanical compression devices, and chemical prophylaxis.11 There has been substantial debate regarding the preferred chemical prophylactic agent among aspirin, enoxaparin, warfarin, and DOAC when weighing VTE prophylaxis efficacy versus bleeding risk.12 Direct oral anticoagulants have a better VTE prophylaxis compared with other anticoagulants, with a lower rate of complications, such as the need for blood transfusion and prolonged wound drainage.13 Aspirin is commonly used for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases, as it inhibits the aggregation of platelets by the irreversible acetylation of cyclooxygenase, thus interfering with the ability of platelet to produce prostaglandin. Aspirin also provided a comparable VTE prophylaxis to that of DOACs.12,14 Recently, some studies recommended the use of aspirin as another option for VTE prophylaxis, in addition to DOAC or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for elective joint replacement surgery, including TKR, combined with mechanical prophylaxis until hospital discharge.15
The current study showed that the VTE incidence was not influenced by the type of thromboprophylaxis used is supported by recent literatures. Several studies also concluded that the use of aspirin following TKR was associated with low rates of thromboembolic events, similar to the rates of those treated with DOAC.14,15 Aspirin has been found to have a low VTE rate, with no difference when compared with enoxaparin following TKR procedure.16 Venker et al.17 showed that DOAC was superior to enoxaparin in preventing DVT. Other randomized clinical trials by Le et al.18 and Xu et al.19 reported that there was no difference between DOACs (rivaroxaban) and aspirin when used as VTE prophylaxis following TKR, which supported the finding of the current study. Administration of VTE prophylaxis also comes with several drawbacks, such as postoperative bleeding and prolonged wound drainage.19 Postoperative bleeding is one of the major concerns of VTE prophylaxis. The more potent the pharmacologic agent, the higher the risk it poses.20 Aspirin has been found to have a lower bleeding risk compared with other VTE prophylaxis agents, as reported by Wilson et al.21 Similarly, DOAC also has a low bleeding risk compared with enoxaparin and warfarin, especially if given in a low dose.13 Another disadvantage of VTE prophylaxis is postoperative wound complication. A study conducted by Lassen et al.22 reported that administration of rivaroxaban increased wound complications following TKR, although not as severe as those found in patients using low molecular weight Heparin (LWMH), as reported by Kulsrestha et al.23 Singh et al.24 have demonstrated that the use of aspirin lowers the rate of prolonged wound drainage in post-TKR patients, hence, lower the risk of developing any possible wound complication, including superficial and deep wound infection. Comparably, another study by Garfinkel et al.25 reported that patients who received DOAC, such as apixaban, for VTE prophylaxis following joint replacement had a significantly higher rate of wound complications and bleeding. Interestingly, the current study found that there was no statistical difference between aspirin and DOAC in terms of wound complications.
Aspirin is a generic, inexpensive, and widely-available anti-platelet drug. Hence, the use of aspirin as a VTE prophylaxis can be such a cost-effective choice.26 As previously stated, Indonesia still comes under the lower-middle income countries, as reported by the World Health Organization. According to the e-catalogue from the Ministry of Health, the cost of aspirin is Rp 116,-/tablet (0.79¢); meanwhile, the price of rivaroxaban is Rp 23.500,-/tablet ($1.39).27 Therefore, given the comparable effect to DOAC as a thromboprophylaxis agent, aspirin remains the most cost-effective thromboprophylaxis agent, especially when compared with factor Xa inhibitor.
There are a few limitations to this study. First, concerning the nature of a retrospective study, the strength of evidence is still limited. The findings still need to be confirmed with future prospective trials with a higher level of evidence. Second, there are inherent selections and observer biases as patients were from a single hospital. Despite these limitations, our findings are clinically important. The samples in our study are large; therefore, they can be adequate to show aspirin is not inferior compared with rivaroxaban. Future multi-center trials are required to reduce the biases.
CONCLUSION
Patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, such as TKR, are at the highest risk for developing VTE during and after hospitalization. The current study showed that there was no significant difference between aspirin and DOAC in preventing VTE following TKR. When choosing the VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing TKR surgery, given the safety, wide availability, and cost-effectiveness, aspirin may be considered as a promising alternative to DOAC for the VTE prophylaxis.
