ABSTRACT:

OBJECTIVE To demonstrate how a surgical task force can help provide access to surgical procedures for many patients waiting for surgery in the Brazilian Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS, in Portuguese) waiting list.
METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study involving 28 patients on the SUS waiting list included in a pediatric scoliosis surgery task force. We analyzed medical records, epidemiological data, and clinical and radiographic outcomes.
RESULTS The data showed that the postoperative outcomes of curve correction and complications, such as infections, surgical wounds, pain, or other events, were consistent with the literature on the subject.
CONCLUSION Therefore, we believe a task force is critical for facilitating access to surgical procedures and restoring the quality of life of hundreds of patients.

Keywords:
scoliosis; spine diseases; surgery task force.

RESUMO:

OBJETIVO Mostrar como o mutirão de cirurgias pode auxiliar no acesso ao procedimento cirúrgico para muitos pacientes que aguardam para realizar cirurgia na fila de espera do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS).
MÉTODOS Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo de coorte que contou com 28 pacientes da lista de espera do SUS, incluídos em um mutirão de cirurgia de escoliose pediátrica, no qual foram realizadas revisão de prontuário, análise epidemiológica e de resultados clínicos e radiográficos.
RESULTADOS Os dados mostraram que os resultados pós-cirúrgicos de correção das curvas e o nível de complicações observadas nos pacientes, tais como o acometimento de infecções, feridas cirúrgicas, dor ou outros tipos de eventos, são compatíveis com a literatura sobre tema.
CONCLUSÃO Sendo assim, entende-se que o mutirão é importante para facilitar o acesso ao procedimento cirúrgico e devolver a qualidade de vida a centenas de pacientes.

Palavras-chave:
doenças da coluna vertebral; escoliose; mutirão de cirurgia.

FIGURES

Citation: Bitencourt Júnior CAB, Pratali RR, Lira RCA, Morais SV, Araújo AMM, Herrero CFPS. Organization of a Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery Task Force and Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes. 60(01):. doi:10.1055/s-0044-1800946
Note: Work carried out at the Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Financial Support The authors declare that they did not receive financial support from agencies in the public, private, or non-profit sectors to conduct the present study.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Received: May 12 2024; Accepted: October 14 2024
 

INTRODUCTION

Although scoliosis is defined as a spinal deformity in the coronal plane greater than 10°, it consists of a rotational vertebral deformity.1 Idiopathic scoliosis is a structural disease in children at or near puberty2 It can have different etiologies, including genetic syndromes, congenital spinal malformations, skeletal dysplasias, connective tissue conditions, and neuromuscular diseases.1

Most cases present a low curvature magnitude per the Cobb angle,3 with no significant clinical repercussions. The prevalence of curvatures with a magnitude large enough to consider surgical treatment is extremely low, ranging from 0.04 to 0.4%.1,4

Most scoliosis cases present non-progressive deformity and do not require surgical treatment. However, some cases present rapid curvature progression requiring surgery due to the complex deformities associated with pediatric scoliosis, leading to the idea of organizing surgical task forces.5

Tasks forces aim to speed up the processing of elective surgeries. Regarding the topic addressed in the present study, the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) pioneered the development of programs to organize training actions for reference centers in the surgical treatment of pediatric scoliosis, culminating in surgical task forces, as recently described in the literature.6,7

In the current paper, we describe a task force for scoliosis treatment and its epidemiological, logistical, radiographic, and clinical data to encourage similar initiatives.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was retrospective, with an observational cohort. Participants were selected from the Brazilian Unified Health System’s (Sistema Único de Saúde [SUS], in Portuguese) waiting list in Maranhão, Brazil, who underwent outpatient reassessment by the group and outpatient anesthesia evaluation. The exclusion criteria were previous surgeries, active infection, and lack of anesthesia for surgery.

We informed all selected patients about the study and invited them to participate after signing the informed consent form and the underage assent form approved by the research ethics committee. The task force occurred at Hospital Universitário from Universidade Federal do Maranhão (HU-UFMA). Twenty-eight patients who underwent surgical procedures between February 1 and 4, 2021, participated in the study.

We collected and recorded demographic data, including gender, age, weight, etiology of the deformity, and time between inclusion on the waiting list and surgery. We calculated the mean, median, and standard deviation values for variables and the frequency of each scoliosis etiology.

We evaluated and tabulated surgical data, including intraoperative bleeding, neurophysiological changes, implant type, and number of implants. In addition, we assessed drainage volume, blood transfusions, and the presence or absence of infections in the postoperative period.

We determined the deformity magnitude per the Cobb angle from all patients in the preoperative and immediate postoperative periods using the SurgiMap (Nemaris Inc., Methuen, MA, USA) application.

Moreover, we collected data from the professionals involved in the task force, such as their area of medical specialty and the Brazilian region in which they operate, through interviews. We recorded logistical data, including the number of operating rooms and intensive care unit (ICU) bed reserves as well as specific needs subjectively observed at each process stage.

 

RESULTS

Demographic and Preoperative Clinical Data

The participants were 10 to 17 years old, including 24 were females and 4 males. Idiopathic (childhood, adolescent, and juvenile) scoliosis was the most common condition, (observed in 20 subjects; 71%), followed by congenital (4 patients; 14%), neuromuscular (3 subjects; 11%), and diplomyelia (1 patient; 4%) etiologies (►Table 1).

Table 1. Sociodemographic data
Patient Scoliosis etiology Pre-procedural height (m) Weight (kg) Gender
M1 Adolescent idiopathic 1.65 46 Female
M2 Neuromuscular 1.43 30 Female
M3 Congenital 1.39 35 Female
M4 Adolescent idiopathic 1.56 48 Female
M5 Adolescent idiopathic 1.54 46 Female
M6 Adolescent idiopathic 1.57 44 Female
M7 Child idiopathic 1.48 60 Female
M8 Adolescent idiopathic 1.62 43 Female
M9 Diplomyelia 1.35 28 Female
M10 Adolescent idiopathic 1.66 55 Female
M11 Adolescent idiopathic 1.55 54 Female
M12 Juvenile idiopathic 1.72 59 Female
M13 Child idiopathic 1.59 43 Female
M14 Adolescent idiopathic 1.65 52.5 Female
M15 Adolescent idiopathic 1.59 47 Female
M16 Neuromuscular 1.30 30 Male
M17 Juvenile idiopathic 1.42 41 Male
M18 Congenital 1.64 60 Male
M19 Juvenile idiopathic 1.53 37.2 Male
M20 Adolescent idiopathic 1.61 47 Female
M21 Neuromuscular 1.30 22 Female
M22 Congenital 1.61 46 Female
M23 Juvenile idiopathic 1.68 55 Male
M24 Adolescent idiopathic 1.66 50 Female
M25 Adolescent idiopathic 1.62 56 Female
M26 Congenital 1.27 23 Female
M27 Adolescent idiopathic 1.64 46 Female
M28 Adolescent idiopathic 1.52 38 Female

The mean age at diagnosis/surgical indication was 10.2 years; the age at surgery was 15.1 years, and the mean time from the diagnosis to the procedure was 4.7 years.

Intraoperative Results

Regarding surgical data (►Table 2), the mean blood loss was 768.61 ml, and 3 patients required blood transfusion. The mean surgical time was 200.74 minutes. Five subjects presented transient neurophysiological changes but no postoperative neurological deficits.

Table 2. Surgical data
Patient Blood loss (mL) Neurophysiological abnormality Episode description Techniques Proximal level included in arthrodesis Distal level included in arthrodesis Surgical time (min)
M1 790 Yes Motor potential drop at derotation. Signals normalized after bar removal. Surgery was completed without further complications. NA T8 L3 180
M2 870 No NA Intraoperative traction: bipolar T1 Ilium 310
M3 110 No NA Laminectomy; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion L4 S1 180
M4 580 No NA NA T4 L2 200
M5 1115 No NA NA T4 T12 180
M6 470 Yes Motor potential drop on the left side. The potential returned after mean blood pressure and room temperature increase. Intraoperative traction T4 L1 220
M7 970 Yes Potential drop on the left side with normalization after traction removal Intraoperative traction. T2 L2 180
M8 650 No NA NA T11 L3 100
M9 1140 No NA Intraoperative traction; costoplasty T3 L3 240
M10 550 No NA Intraoperative traction T4 L3 300
M11 960 No NA NA T4 L4 200
M12 1400 No NA Osteotomies (3) T4 L4 300
M13 1010 No NA Intraoperative traction T4 L2 200
M14 610 No NA NA T4 T12 145
M15 900 No NA NA T6 L3 135
M16 350 No NA Intraoperative traction; bipolar T1 Ilium 250
M17 1500 No NA Intraoperative traction; osteotomies (3) T2 L2 220
M18 560 No NA Osteotomies (3) T2 L2 280
M19 980 No NA Osteotomies (3); intraoperative traction T4 L3 120
M20 690 No NA NA T10 L4 120
M21 840 No NA Intraoperative traction; bipolar T1 Ilium 220
M22 1,250 Yes Motor and sensory potential drop during osteotomy. The potential normalized after decompression and osteotomy completion. Asymmetric pedicle subtraction osteotomy in T10 T6 L3 270
M23 740 No NA NA T3 T12 200
M24 950 No NA Osteotomies (3) T3 L2 200
M25 300 No NA NA T4 T12 100
M26 330 Yes Potential drop in the left leg with normalization after traction decrease intraoperative traction C7 L1 240
M27 820 No NA Proximal level translation T4 L3 200
M28 590 No NA NA T11 L4 150

Seventeen patients underwent traction procedures and type 2 osteotomies; five, intraoperative traction; three, intraoperative traction combined with the bipolar technique; three, intraoperative traction and osteotomies; one, intraoperative traction combined with costoplasty; and three patients underwent osteotomies alone.

Other surgical procedures included asymmetric pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) of T10, laminectomy, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Regarding arthrodesis, the proximal level of screw insertion was the thoracic region, mainly in the T4 vertebra; in 1 patient, it occurred in the cervical region (C7) and, in another subject, in the lumbar region (L4). The distal level concentrated in the lumbar region; in four patients, it occurred in the thoracic region (T12), in the sacrum region (S1) in one patient, and, in three subjects, the procedure occurred in the hip region (ilium).

All patients received implants. In total, we used 457 implants, including screws, rods, hooks, and sublaminar bands.

Clinical Postoperative Outcomes and Complications

The clinical postoperative data (►Table 3) show that the average time to discharge was 6.92 days. All patients presented secretions or blood in the drain on the 1st day after surgery (average volume, 370.05 mL), 27 (96%) subjects on the 2nd day (average volume, 252.59 mL), 9 (32%) on the 3rd day (average volume, 144.66 mL), and only 1 (4%) on the 4th day (280 mL).

Table 3. Postoperative outcomes
Patient Time to discharge Right drain 1 output (mL) Right drain 2 output (mL) Right drain 3 output (mL) Right drain 4 output (mL) Transfused blood bags Number Hemoglobin, PO1 Hemoglobin, PO3 Infections Infection description Other complications Complication description
M1 5 days 225 175 150 Yes 2 8.2 9.8 No Yes Nausea and vomiting
M2 12 days 680 350 Yes 3 12.6 12.8 No No
M3 4 days 300 200 No 11.1 11.0 No No
M4 4 days 370 250 No 10.6 10.1 No No
M5 6 days 317 150 No 10.2 9.9 No No
M6 8 days 454 300 No 9.4 9.1 No No
M7 7 days 144 180 Yes 2 8.2 10.2 No Yes Nausea and vomiting
M8 5 days 300 150 86 No 9.0 8.1 No Yes Nausea and vomiting
M9 5 days 480 200 Yes 2 8.1 12.2 No Yes Intense pain
M10 6 days 290 278 No 10.1 10.7 No Yes Dyspnea at moderate exertion
M11 6 days 450 140 Yes 4 8.4 12.3 No Yes Nausea and vomiting
M12 18 days 250 500 500 Yes 3 7.5 9.3 Yes Surgical site infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae Yes Secretive surgical wound, debridement on Feb 12
M13 7 days 155 45 No 9.7 8.1 No Yes Nausea and vomiting
M14 6 days 300 188 Yes 1 8.5 10.7 No Yes Moderate pain
M15 5 days 390 380 120 No 9.5 9.6 No No
M16 14 days 630 450 No 11.2 10.3 Yes UTI by Enterobacter cloacae Yes Sacral stasis ulcer
M17 5 days 550 190 Yes 3 7.6 10.5 No Yes Metabolic acidosis
M18 5 days 250 450 53 No 13.6 11.3 No No
M19 6 days 500 150 Yes 1 9.7 11.0 No Yes Metabolic acidosis
M20 18 days 370 500 115 280 Yes 2 9.1 9.4 No Yes Functional obstruction, seizures, hypokalemia.
M21 8 days 400 344 No 10.9 11.1 No No
M22 5 days 725 400 118 No 9.0 8.4 No Yes Intense pain
M23 5 days 400 200 No 11.4 11.0 No No
M24 6 days 303 100 No 9.4 8.4 No Yes Bladder globe, metabolic acidosis
M25 4 days 350 170 100 No 8.9 8.9 No No
M26 5 days 358 180 Yes 2 8.0 11.2 No No
M27 5 days 200 Yes 2 8.0 10.9 No Yes Nausea and vomiting
M28 4 days 220 200 60 No 10.3 10.4 No No

Twelve patients (43%) required blood bags postoperatively. Six received two, three received three, two received one, and one received four bags.

Among complications, two subjects presented infection; one had urinary tract infection (UTI) by Enterobacter cloacae, and the other had a surgical site infection by Klebsiella pneumoniae. In percentage terms, by etiology, we observed 5% of surgical site infections in idiopathic cases, with no other surgical site infections. Sixteen patients (57%) presented some complication, including eight with nausea and vomiting, two with intense pain, one with moderate pain, two with metabolic acidosis, one with acidosis and urinary alterations (bladder globe), one with a sacral stasis ulcer, one required surgical debridement, one presented dyspnea on moderate exertion, and one presented functional obstruction, seizures, and hypokalemia.

Preand Postoperative Radiographic Results

Regarding the radiographic data, the preoperative mean Cobb angles were 29.3 degrees (range, 0-68) for the upper thoracic curve, 3.6 degrees (range, 0-120) for the lower thoracic curve, 42.2 degrees (range, 16-79) for the lumbar curve, 36.6 degrees (range, 5 to 75) of thoracic kyphosis, and 55.6 degrees (range, 8-86) of lumbar lordosis (►Table 4). In the immediate postoperative period, the average correction was 28% for the upper thoracic curve, 47% for the lower thoracic curve, and 50% for the lumbar curve (postoperativemeanvaluesof21 degrees,34.2 degrees,and 21.5 degrees, respectively).

Table 4. Radiographic outcomes
Patient Preoperative proximal thoracic Cobb angle (degrees) Preoperative distal thoracic Cobb angle (degrees) Preoperative lumbar Cobb angle (degrees) Preoperative kyphosis Cobb angle (degrees) Preoperative lordosis Cobb angle (degrees) Postoperative proximal thoracic Cobb angle (degrees) Postoperative distal thoracic Cobb angle (degrees) Postoperative lumbar Cobb angle (degrees) Postoperative kyphosis Cobb angle (degrees) Postoperative lordosis Cobb angle (degrees)
M1 22 49 35 43 60 20 29 21 2 36
M2 50 86 36 17 46 34 61 25 4 56
M3 0 0 55 38 66 0 0 50 38 46
M4 35 72 38 16 58 16 23 9 27 47
M5 30 48 36 27 57 3 27 31 20 50
M6 33 106 55 47 50 22 29 34 36 45
M7 49 83 44 58 86 38 44 25 49 68
M8 15 36 45 5 30 24 33 16 13 34
M9 68 120 20 75 56 20 56 0 40 52
M10 27 56 68 5 48 5 23 48 33 45
M11 66 103 40 41 55 56 54 21 15 49
M12 0 50 79 5 8 0 26 23 19 33
M13 49 78 43 28 57 35 44 20 39 55
M14 9 54 40 18 65 15 25 7 32 20
M15 16 49 48 38 71 15 37 31 30 52
M16 12 22 50 28 72 20 14 34 28 80
M17 30 97 37 70 45 27 65 25 50 50
M18 40 74 47 56 58 33 54 27 41 36
M19 30 94 38 58 53 35 38 17 38 40
M20 6 36 47 36 52 6 10 20 40 50
M21 45 101 16 62 68 40 78 2 3 45
M22 51 89 44 70 76 28 53 21 55 55
M23 23 60 34 25 43 26 30 26 28 35
M24 43 57 30 42 56 29 35 16 38 50
M25 19 40 20 10 71 5 0 0 12 60
M26 45 87 31 65 57 37 48 10 33 24
M27 6 0 40 23 48 0 0 16 40 40
M28 2 34 66 19 45 0 24 27 30 37
29.32142857 63.60714286 42.21428571 36.60714286 55.60714286 21.03571429 34.28571429 21.5 29.75 46.55555556
Percentage of curve correction High thoracic: 28% Low thoracic: 47% Lumbar: 50%

Addressing non-idiopathic scoliosis separately, the correction percentage of the main curve was 28% in neuromuscular scoliosis and 30% in congenital scoliosis.

Organizational and logistical results

The hospital structure included an outpatient clinic, a radiology department, 5 dedicated surgical rooms available for 4 days, and approximately 10 to 15 ICU beds for routine postoperative care. The surgical team included volunteer doctors and doctors from the hospital staff. The implants were donated, so we could not assess their costs with precision.

Although the surgeries occurred over 4 days in February 2021, the task force organization began in 2020 (►Fig. 1).

 

DISCUSSION

Most patients were female, including 24 (86%) of the 28 subjects. This data is consistent with another study with 169 patients, including 121 (71.6%) females.7 Another study on the incidence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in several countries noted that the prevalence and severity of scoliosis were higher in girls.8

The present study also found a higher prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis, accounting for 20 cases (71%). In the current literature, the overall prevalence of AIS ranges from 0.47 to 5.2%.8 A review from Pereira and Gomes9 mentions studies corroborating our results: in a sample of 358 subjects, 16 had AIS (prevalence, 4.8%);10 in a sample of 3,105 subjects, 38 had AIS (prevalence, 5.3%);11 among 418 subjects, 18 adolescents had AIS (prevalence, 4.3%);12 among 2,562 adolescents, 37 had AIS (prevalence, 1.5%).13 These data demonstrate that our study is consistent with the epidemiological literature.

Regarding postoperative complications, discomforts are frequent, including nausea and vomiting in the first hours after surgery due to oral refeeding or anesthesia, dyspnea, oliguria,14 odynophagia, pain at the intravenous injection sites, insomnia, and constipation.15,16 Eight patients presented nausea and vomiting, one had dyspnea with moderate exertion, and one had functional obstruction; these are common reactions in postoperative patients.

As for pain, a citation highlights that “[...] the surgical wound is not spontaneously painful after 48 hours of the surgical procedure”14. Therefore, it is critical to ascertain the pain level and perform the required procedures. Among the 28 patients, only 2 presented intense pain, while 1 had moderate pain, with no other complications.

Other more painful occurrences may occur in the postoperative period of surgical procedures in general, including bleeding, wound infection, venous thrombosis, respiratory failure, pulmonary thromboembolism, pulmonary atelectasis, and UTI.15,16

Other studies on postoperative infections in patients treated for spinal deformities report UTIs, sphincter control loss, contamination, wound infections, gastrointestinal disorders, and pulmonary complications17 They also reported a higher infection risk in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis than those with AIS. In the present study, complications and infections were common in postoperative patients18

Sensitivity loss in the extremities may cause loss of bowel or bladder control, especially in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis.18 The complications observed in patient M16 (with neuromuscular scoliosis) may be related to the scoliosis type as they could not walk and had a UTI and a sacral ulcer.

The most severe complication occurred in patient M12 (AIS), who developed a surgical wound infection, a complication also observed in other studies.15-18 The treatment was surgical debridement mentioned as the usual therapy,18 with surgical site irrigation. In the literature, the infection rate in surgery for AIS ranged from 0.9 to 3%, and, for neuromuscular scoliosis, it ranged from 4.2 to 20%. In our study, the prevalence of surgical wound infection was approximately 3.5% in the general analysis and 5% among idiopathic cases.

Regarding other complications, the data depends on the consulted databases, ranging from 5 to 23% in AIS. More recent data from the SRS database, from 2011, cited a complication rate of 6.3% for all cases of idiopathic scoliosis (IS). In our study, 16 patients (57%) presented complications; those associated with the specific type of surgery affected 6 out of the 28 patients, that is, a prevalence rate of 21%, with only one major complication (which led to reoperation), a surgical site infection.

Since the complication and infection rates are consistent with the literature, the short time of surgery has no relationship with complications.

Radiographically, the overall average correction was 28% for the high thoracic curve, 47% for the low thoracic curve, and 50% for the lumbar curve (postoperative averages of 21 degrees, 34.2 degrees, and 21.5 degrees, respectively). Afterstratificationbynon-idiopathicetiologies,the main curve correction was 28% in neuromuscular scoliosis and 30% in congenital scoliosis. In a study19 analyzing several postoperative outcomes, an article published in 1973, with 71 participants using Harrington rods, Risser plaster, and early ambulation, reported a mean preoperative curve of 56°, with 54% correction on the day of surgery and 46% correction at follow-up. In 1989, a study with 352 patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion reported a mean preoperative curve of 54° and a mean correction of preoperative active supine tilt of 48%. The average correction at surgery was 52% and 40% at the 2-year follow-up19

In 2004, a comparative study of 4 different instrumentations (double rod, multi-hook systems) involving 127 patients and using the C-D Horizon, Moss-Miami, TSRH, and Isola systems showed an average correction of 63% for the C-D Horizon and Moss-Miami and 58% for the TSRH and Isola.19

The curve correction over the years remained similar, and the values achieved in our study are consistent with the literature. As such, although the curve correction was not complete, the outcomes were satisfactory.19Figs. 2-5 visually demonstrate the correction level achieved in some patients.

Regarding logistics, we had some difficulties during the task force, but no similar studies addressed them. In the preoperative period, we faced challenges in publicizing the triage clinic and contacting several patients. In addition, we needed to train radiology technicians to perform spinal panoramic radiographs in orthostasis. We also required large treatment rooms to take photographs and clinically evaluate the patients in the triage clinic. For the preoperative evaluation, we needed an anesthesiology clinic to assess and prepare patients for the procedure.

The logistical difficulties during surgery included gathering staff and resources for the stipulated task force time. The task force required a team of professionals from various areas of expertise and different Brazilian states with experience in scoliosis surgery and availability.

In the postoperative period, the challenges included ICU room availability. We required approximately 10 to 15 beds at the same time because sometimes more severe patients could not be discharged from the ICU on the first postoperative day. In addition, we needed nursing and physical therapy teams trained in scoliosis treatment procedures to maintain drains, change dressings, or ensure early ambulation.

The literature about surgical task forces5,7 for correcting scoliosis curves provided no data on logistical difficulties or reported complications potentially warranted by these joint efforts. However, some news reports provided data on task forces and highlighted critical points.

The Regional Medical Council of the State of Bahia (CREMEB, for its acronym in Portuguese),20 in 2018, warned about some issues in task forces, including problems resulting from the scenarios in which these surgeries occur and complication risks from surgical procedures, especially because of the potential lack of qualified personnel for intraoperative and postoperative monitoring.

Despite the news reports on complications in task forces, none deals with scoliosis surgery, and the cases with problems are low compared to the number of benefited people. In December 2022, Centro Estadual de Reabilitação e Readaptação Dr. Henrique Santillo (CRER), a rehabilitation center from the Health Department of Goiás, Brazil, performed elective scoliosis surgeries in patients on the SUS list. Twenty patients underwent treatment; some had been on the waiting list for about 5 years, and the surgery improved their quality of life.21

In Pernambuco, Brazil, the traumatology and orthopedics team at Hospital Otávio de Freitas performed a surgical series for scoliosis treatment in 18 patients to minimize the SUS waiting list. This team did 4 procedures per day in 3 dedicated surgical rooms and used 16 beds from the adult and pediatric wards, trauma surgical center, ICU, and recovery room.22

In our study, the average age at diagnosis was 10.2 years, and surgery occurred at 15.1 years old, with a waiting time for the procedure of 4.7 years. In Brazil, a study23 with 51 patients, all diagnosed from ages 10 to 17 years old, and the average waiting time for surgery was 25.41 months (ranging from 2-180 months). However, some patients waited for the surgery for up to 15 years. This waiting time can compromise the patient’s quality of life, self-image, satisfaction, and functionality.24

We did not analyze the quality of life or personal satisfaction questionnaires because of logistical issues.

 

CONCLUSION

Despite the difficulties in organizing similar actions and some complications, it seems feasible to encourage the multiplication of these task forces in more hospitals due to the high number of patients on waiting lists for scoliosis surgery. However, it is fundamental to emphasize the need for more actions using this model to assess accurately its safety and applicability, especially in severe and non-idiopathic cases.

 

REFERENCES

Kim HJ, Blanco JS, Widmann RF. Update on the management of idiopathic scoliosis. Curr Opin Pediatr 2009;21(01):55-64
Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet2008;371(9623): 1527-1537
Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect 1948;5:261-275
Yawn BP, Yawn RA, Hodge D, et al. A population-based study of school scoliosis screening. JAMA 1999;282(15): 1427-1432
Fletcher AN, Schwend RM. The Ecuador Pediatric Spine Deformity Surgery Program: An SRS-GOP Site, 2008-2016. Spine Deform 2019;7(02):220-227
Nemani VM, Kim HJ, Bjerke-Kroll BT, et al; FOCOS Spine Study Group. Preoperative halo-gravity traction for severe spinal deformities at an SRS-GOP site in West Africa: protocols, complications, and results. Spine 2015;40(03):153-161
Mattedi Rda VBatista PR de, Machado IC, Jacob Junior C, Rezende R. Estudo descritivo sobre o primeiro mutirão no Brasil de cirurgias eletivas para tratamento de escoliose. Coluna/Columna 2012;11 (01):63-65
Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 2013;7(01):3-9
Pereira BF, Gomes MVP. Prevalência da escoliose idiopática em adolescentes no Brasil: revisão sistemática [Trabalho de conclusão de curso]. Belém: Universidade Federal do Pará; 2021
Leal JF, Leal JSLM, Gomes CER, Guimarães MDC. Inquérito epidemiológico sobre escoliose idiopática do adolescente. Rev Bras Ortop 2006;41(08):309-319
do Espírito Santo A, Guimarães LV, Galera MF. [Prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis and associated variables in schoolchildren of elementary public schools in Cuiabá, state of Mato Grosso, 2002]. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2011;14(02):347-356
de Souza FI, Di Ferreira RB, Labres D, Elias R, de Sousa AP, Pereira RE. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in students of the public schools in Goiânia-GO. Acta Ortop Bras 2013;21(04): 223-225
Penha PJ, Ramos NLJP, de Carvalho BKG, Andrade RM, Schmitt ACB, João SMA. Prevalence of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Spine 2018;43(24):1710-1718
Stracieri LDS. Cuidados e complicações pós-operatórias. Medicina (B Aires) 2008;41(04):465-468
Vilefort LA, Sabino IMO, Muniz LB, et al. Principais complicações pós-operatórias: revisão narrativa. Acervo Científico 2021;36:1-7
Paez R. Quais são as complicações pós-operatórias mais comuns? Dr. Rodrigo Paez [Internet]. 2022. [citado 18 maio 2023]. Disponível em: https://www.rodrigopaez.com.br/publicacoes/quaissao-as-complicacoes-pos-operatorias-mais-comuns/
Bachy M, Bouyer B, Vialle R. Infections after spinal correction and fusion for spinal deformities in childhood and adolescence. Int Orthop 2012;36(02):465-469
Murphy RF, Mooney JF III. Complications following spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2016;9(04):462-469
Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F. How much correction is enough? Spine 2007;32(24):2641-2643
Conselho Regional de Medicina do Estado da Bahia. Cremeb alerta população: o que está por trás de um ‘Mutirão de Cirurgias’. Cremeb [Internet]. 2018. [citado 20 maio 2023]. Disponível em: https://www.cremeb.org.br/index.php/noticias/cremeb-alertapopulacao-o-que-esta-por-tras-de-um-mutirao-de-cirurgias/
Neto F. J. Mutirão de Escoliose do Crer transforma a vida de 20 pacientes. Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Goiás [Internet] 2022. [citado 20 maio 2023]. Disponível em: https://www.saude.go.gov.br/noticias/17072-mutirao-de-escoliose-do-crer-transforma-a-vida-de-20-pacientes
Governo do Estado de Pernambuco. HOF promove mutirão para tratamento de escoliose. Secretaria Estadual de Saúde [Internet]. 2022. [citado 20 maio 2023]. Disponível em: http://portal.saude.pe.gov.br/noticias/secretaria-executiva-de-vigilancia-em-saude/hof-promove-mutirao-para-tratamento-de
de Lima Júnior PC, Pellegrino L, Caffaro MFS, Meves R, Landim E, Avanzi O. Escoliose idiopática do adolescente (eia): perfil clínico e radiográfico da lista de espera para tratamento cirúrgico em hospital terciário de alta complexidade do Sistema Público de Saúde Brasileiro. Coluna/Columna 2011;10(02):111-115
Marinho MF, Paz JVC. Qualidade de vida após tratamento cirúrgico para escoliose idiopática do adolescente: revisão sistemática da literatura. Res Soc Develop 2022;11(04):1-8